Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenate advances Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett in near party-line vote ... (AP)
Link to tweet
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate advances Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett in near party-line vote ... (AP) (Original Post)
tgenerico
Oct 2020
OP
ramblin_dave
(1,563 posts)1. Why does it say "near" party line vote? No Democrats voted to proceed.
The 51-48 vote launched 30 hours of Senate debate. Two Republicans, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine, voted against advancing the nominee, and all Democrats who voted were opposed. California Sen. Kamala Harris, the vice presidential nominee, missed the vote while campaigning in Michigan.
mobeau69
(12,374 posts)2. I guess it's not considered "party line" unless all members of a party actually vote.
I did not know that.
FBaggins
(28,706 posts)6. There are only 47 Democrats
(Counting two who caucus with Democrats)
Two Republicans (Collins and Murkowski) voted no.
bluestarone
(22,179 posts)3. Hell, The Senate Dems. should NOT
Even show up for the final vote!
mobeau69
(12,374 posts)5. Agree. Why participate in a sham?
FBaggins
(28,706 posts)7. Making her the first unanimous nominee since Kennedy?
bdamomma
(69,532 posts)4. so sickening
another no experienced person on the SC.
She's no Justice Ginsburg.