Susan Collins, Does this mean anything?

[vrguy]

Link to tweet

?s=19

[CanonRay]

1. Yes, It means they have enough votes without her.

I speak fluent hypocrite

[Ferrets are Cool]

9. This x 1000

[The Magistrate]

11. Exactly, Sir

I suspect this weasel has popped its last pop....

[KPN]

13. BINGO!

[dixiegrrrrl]

17. Yep.

Murkawski is not up for re-election for 4 more years, Collins is losing her race.

[mucifer]

2. She is trying to play to repubs and dems

[Eyeball_Kid]

3. Meh. Three more no votes and we're talking turkey. n/t

[Tribetime]

4. Just let it go...retirement is just ahead

[Baitball Blogger]

5. Now that Lisa Murkowski has announced she will vote in Barrett's favor,

another useless no vote from Collins.

Get lost, lady. Both of you.

[MLAA]

7. +1000

[dem4decades]

6. She stands for nothing. If she had no problem with Barrett, why not vote for her.

[NRaleighLiberal]

8. meh. she's dead to me.

[TheFarseer]

10. So if it was in the lame duck session

It would be fine? Does that make any sense to anyone?

[50 Shades Of Blue]

12. A Profile in Cowardice.

[KPN]

14. ... and Bullshit

[SeattleVet]

15. It means that McConnell gave her permission to vote NO in an attempt to save her seat.

As I wrote about Collins yesterday in a message thread about Murkowski declaring that she'd vote for Barrett:

she's in a LOT of trouble right now, and the repukes have enough votes without her, so there's a chance that she'll get permission from Moscow Mitch to either abstain or vote NO in a frantic attempt to save her seat. People in Maine remember her Kavanaugh slap-in-the-face to them and her polling has been under 50% and falling.

[JDC]

16. She is, w/o compare, the emptiest suit in the senate.

[Demonaut]

18. she has the backbone of a jellyfish

[crickets]

19. It won't be enough to save you, Susan. Buh-bye. nt