General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWouldn't it be great if a network had enough of trump and his propaganda
They go a full day without mentioning his name, and refuse to show him spreading his propaganda .
Enterstageleft
(3,395 posts)bdamomma
(63,840 posts)when he crowed that he is making those networks a lot of money.
Fuck him.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)show is just extraneous (for no reason) footage of Trump. I can't stand his face, or the sound of his voice, so I've sworn off a couple of shows until after the election. It's so unfair that Trump campaign events get all this free media, while Joe Biden has to pay for his.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)I only recently subscribed again after getting a sweet deal, and realizing that it will give me more chances to see him suffer this time around.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,233 posts)a choice. But, in the meantime, I will probably switch back to my regular MSNBC schedule when The Orange Turd loses in a landslide (fingers crossed). I love Rachel, and lately, Nicole. It's very rare that you ever see Trump's face on Rachel's show, and she doesn't give a hoot about his tweets.
Sometimes I wonder if all the hosts on MSNBC really want to get rid of Dump. I've read here that one of the network CEO's said Trump was good for the cable news business. It must be true, because how many cable anchors, WH reporters, or political pundits haven't written a book yet?
brooklynite
(94,508 posts)Ignoring the news (good or bad) isn't a good way to go through life.
marlakay
(11,451 posts)Things Trump has done and vote for Biden then all the people said what will they do in their lives without Trump to talk about, but even that and the way they said it was a slam to Trump.
It was basically showing how T has taken over our lives daily with his tweets and sucking the life out of the news.