Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How's this for an idea? Pack the court next year, and appoint these four...... (Original Post) George II Oct 2020 OP
I'd call that unpacking. McConnel has fudge-packed SCROTUS. lagomorph777 Oct 2020 #1
Not Sure Barack Would Be Interested sfstaxprep Oct 2020 #2
Expansion of the SC. roamer65 Oct 2020 #3
All ultra liberal women and/or minorities. roamer65 Oct 2020 #4
No no vercetti2021 Oct 2020 #5
Young progs helped get us here. They need to come with law degrees & solid years of Constitutional.. Budi Oct 2020 #11
Young. Young. Young. servermsh Oct 2020 #6
Exactly. Nobody over 50. n/t Blaukraut Oct 2020 #9
Yes. Yes. Yes ornotna Oct 2020 #13
I think Biden promised to name a black woman to SC n/t Claustrum Oct 2020 #7
I would prefer to call it UNPACK the court which the repukes packed AmericanCanuck Oct 2020 #8
No one has earned that seat more than Hillary Clinton. Budi Oct 2020 #10
Just please call it "expansion" of the Courts. Boogiemack Oct 2020 #12
Yes to both of those :-) meadowlander Oct 2020 #19
Hillary's too old. Jeebo Oct 2020 #14
Merrick Garland is much too moderate for this operation budkin Oct 2020 #15
Garland (68 in a couple weeks), and especially Clinton (73) are too old. We would get far too short Celerity Oct 2020 #16
Even though he is 60, Adam Schiff could be a wonderful addition! Totally Tunsie Oct 2020 #17
Was going to say Eric Holder but he's 69! meadowlander Oct 2020 #18
 

sfstaxprep

(10,599 posts)
2. Not Sure Barack Would Be Interested
Mon Oct 26, 2020, 11:09 PM
Oct 2020

The others are great, but Clinton would generate loads of controversy obviously.

roamer65

(37,953 posts)
3. Expansion of the SC.
Mon Oct 26, 2020, 11:09 PM
Oct 2020

We did it in 1869 to match the 9 circuits. Expand to 13 now for the 13 circuits.

 

vercetti2021

(10,481 posts)
5. No no
Mon Oct 26, 2020, 11:11 PM
Oct 2020

I want young progressives on there to make the GOP'S life a living hell for 50+ Years

 

Budi

(15,325 posts)
11. Young progs helped get us here. They need to come with law degrees & solid years of Constitutional..
Mon Oct 26, 2020, 11:22 PM
Oct 2020

knowledge.

I have no faith in the 'young progressives' I've seen so far.
Photo ops & a couple years in Congress doesn't earn a seat on our SC.

There are others far more qualified in Constitutional Law.




 

AmericanCanuck

(1,102 posts)
8. I would prefer to call it UNPACK the court which the repukes packed
Mon Oct 26, 2020, 11:12 PM
Oct 2020

I like those four .... but we should appoint 6.

I'd add Stacy Abrams and Eric Swalwell.

 

Budi

(15,325 posts)
10. No one has earned that seat more than Hillary Clinton.
Mon Oct 26, 2020, 11:17 PM
Oct 2020

That would be the only way Justice would be served.

You list of 4 is spot on. My choice as well if there's ever a chance of righting a good 6 years of wrongs.





 

Boogiemack

(1,406 posts)
12. Just please call it "expansion" of the Courts.
Mon Oct 26, 2020, 11:22 PM
Oct 2020

Merrick should be the first pick. If he gets two, I would like to see Myra Wiley on the SCOTUS or Chuck Rosenberg.

Jeebo

(2,560 posts)
14. Hillary's too old.
Mon Oct 26, 2020, 11:26 PM
Oct 2020

She wouldn't be there long enough. I like the other ones, but instead of Hillary find someone comparable who's about 40. Somebody in this thread said Barack Obama might not be interested; in that case, how about Michelle Obama?

Also, I wish we would not call it court packing. That's what the Republicons in the Senate and the White House have been doing for the past four years. What we would be doing is restoring balance to the courts. Not just the Supreme Court, but other federal courts too, something needs to be done to restore balance to them.

-- Ron

budkin

(6,849 posts)
15. Merrick Garland is much too moderate for this operation
Mon Oct 26, 2020, 11:28 PM
Oct 2020

Extreme progressives all the way I say.

Celerity

(54,405 posts)
16. Garland (68 in a couple weeks), and especially Clinton (73) are too old. We would get far too short
Tue Oct 27, 2020, 12:28 AM
Oct 2020

a time out of both of them.

Garland is also too moderate, he was only picked as President Obama thought he could get him past the Rethug Senate. The last thing we need is a justice who may hop on board with the RWers on occasion in big big cases.

Even Obama (60yo next summer) and Klobuchar (61yo in spring) are pushing the age limit we need to looking at, but I would be fine with Obama as one of the four. Even if Klobuchar was 40 or 45yo, I will pass. We have better candidates out there than her. Her racial justice issues from her time as the Hennepin County Attorney will not play well. It was a big reason she withdrew from VP consideration.

meadowlander

(5,133 posts)
18. Was going to say Eric Holder but he's 69!
Tue Oct 27, 2020, 12:49 AM
Oct 2020

He could easily pass as 20 years younger.

I like Amy Berman Jackson but she's too old as well.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How's this for an idea? P...