Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJustice Thomas' wife boosts unsupported claims against Biden
https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-clarence-thomas-media-amy-coney-barrett-social-media-d7df89f52e02c13ec0d2784a54cdc7f3The wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is using her Facebook page to amplify unsubstantiated claims of corruption by Joe Biden.
...
Last week, she reposted a video that features Trump personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani and the headline, The Biden Crime Family: How They Made Millions.
Again asking people to share the link, Thomas wrote, The mainstream media does not want people to know the facts of what this video reveal.
On Oct. 14, she pointed followers to an attack on philanthropist George Soros. Who is really running the Democrat Party? The Soros family, the shared link says, featuring photos of Soros relations with Democratic vice presidential nominee Kamala Harris, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton.
...
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Thomas' wife boosts unsupported claims against Biden (Original Post)
Ponietz
Oct 2020
OP
TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts)1. She is just a vile person.
Maxheader
(4,419 posts)2. well the snarky bitch...
Shoulda whined only on Joe..,
She went total old history on Soros...imho...
leftyladyfrommo
(19,965 posts)3. She is worse than he is if that's even possible. nt
3Hotdogs
(15,148 posts)4. Musta been another sale at Bottle King.
Buckeyeblue
(6,280 posts)5. He should now have to recuse from any election related cases
Not doing so would be an ethics violation.
If he doesn't recuse, the House should immediately begin an investigation into possible ethics violations.
I suggested the same in another thread if Barrett doesn't recuse.
I think holding such hearings could help us lay the groundwork for expansion.
dmr
(28,705 posts)6. Funny how I only hear about Soros from the Right.
The Right always spouts his name and the "evil" things he does.
So, how come we never talk about him? (Rhetorical question.)
tanyev
(48,865 posts)7. Shouldn't Ofclarence be too busy ironing his socks and underwear?
