General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew Battleground States poll (Univision): Biden +3 FL, +5 PA, +5 AZ, -3 TX
https://www.univision.com/univision-news/politics/no-clear-front-runner-in-texas-or-florida-according-to-latest-univision-news-poll
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)30 yr old vote.
vercetti2021
(10,481 posts)I guess they see it as not obtainable. Least not this cycle anyway
LisaL
(48,014 posts)Campaigns do their own internal polls and those probably don't show Joe winning TX as of yet.
vercetti2021
(10,481 posts)If we can win the statehouse. I'll call it a win. Gotta start at state level first
Its that they don't have good reason to go there electorally. No real reason to spend time in Texas a week out of an election thats likely to be decided in the upper Midwest and PA.
Texas is certainly winnable right now, but if Biden wins it he has likely already won enough other states to get to 270.
Just run ads and get the message out, but don't send the candidates there this close to the end.
GA, NC, and AZ are better insurance policies since we lead there already
It would be nice to win but time is so valuable to go after a state with low odds.
Let's just win, Texas is gravy and we talked about TX last cycle. Wasn't a good idea then either.
GA also makes some sense in order to help boost the Dems running for Senate (Ossoff and Warnock) .
But the safest bet is PA, MI, and WI. We have governors there that could oppose any attempt to mess with the electoral college votes.
Amishman
(5,953 posts)I know the conventional logic is we benefit from high turnout, but in places where there is a republican voter registration advantage, the higher the turnout the more things will 'run home' to that underlying landscape
Marius25
(3,213 posts)And Texas is very hard to poll with this level of turnout.
They wouldn't be sending Kamala to Texas if internals weren't good.