General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRalston: Trump doing better with rurals in Nevada than '16, but...
It may not matter.
Per Ralston:
First, the Republicans are up in the rurals by 30,000 ballots and nearly 28 percentage points with about half the vote in. Trump won rural Nevada by nearly 58,000 votes in 2016. I have said it could be as much as 70,000 this cycle. I may have underestimated it.
And even though the percentage margins are huge, consider: If one million voters turn out in Clark County and this seems about right and Biden wins Clark by 10 points (Clinton won it by almost 11), that's 100,000 votes. That easily offsets the rural win, even if it is 80,000, and that would mean Trump would need to win Washoe by 20,000 votes to have a chance. That is highly unlikely if not impossible Clinton won Washoe by 3,000 votes and Biden may do better. He surely will not do that much worse unless something very strange is happening. (The Democrats have a 5,000-ballot lead in Washoe right now.)
https://thenevadaindependent.com/article/the-early-voting-blog-3
rockfordfile
(8,742 posts)LisaL
(47,365 posts)This blog is making me nervous.
qazplm135
(7,654 posts)expect no less.
hatrack
(64,502 posts)So when their lips get cyanotic, and their lungs go all necrotic, they'll still be able to savor the exquisite pleasure of the hate-licensing their Lord and Master provided.
Seasider
(208 posts)We also have to remember that it wasnt so long ago, Nevada was a reliable red state just like New Mexico and Colorado used to be.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)With the dynamics of Population Shifts,this most likely will be the last major vote total of that size for Rural Nevada. Massive influx of California newbie's are changing our purple to dark Blue. And as the Mines continue to peter out in the Rural areas,the Population shift is to the two major Cities. Very very few you folks in Rural Nevada and that trend will only accelerate.
Jamesyu
(259 posts)And I dont think 100% of that vote going to Trump.
dawg day
(7,947 posts)Rural people, poor people, working people-- he thinks they're rubes and losers and wants to take away their education, SS, and health insurance.
And they love him for it.
bdamomma
(69,354 posts)brainwashed. If he told them to drink the kool aid, they would do it.
He is their cult leader.
Response to dawg day (Reply #5)
bdamomma This message was self-deleted by its author.
42bambi
(1,753 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)And Biden has been winning those by huge margins.
BainsBane
(57,621 posts)assume they are all voting for Trump. That may not be the case.
Jamesyu
(259 posts)to Clinton. So I take what he says with a grain of salt to hype his blog.
Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)In 2016 Ralston underestimated rural percentages toward Trump, just like Steve Schale in Florida and all the analysts in midwestern states. Now the variable is whether Biden can grab greater percentage of the white vote to offset the even higher level of GOP rural turnout
NameAlreadyTaken
(2,271 posts)and it's about 80% Trump here. But the populations of rural Nevada counties are so small that they are easily overwhelmed by Clark County (Vegas) and Washoe County (Reno). Nevada as a whole went for Hillary, though just barely. All statewide elective offices are currently held by Democrats. Nevada was traditionally a Republican state, but migration from California has made the difference.
RockRaven
(18,937 posts)states or places like TX which are being cast as now potentially competitive...
It is reasonable to assume that some of the higher voter turnout is highly motivated right wing idiots who have spent five years marinating in proTrump propaganda from FUX and RW talk radio instead of merely the 1 year of indoctrination the last time around.
