Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Flaleftist

(3,473 posts)
Sat Oct 31, 2020, 10:50 PM Oct 2020

Can the Supreme Court block expansion of the Supreme Court?

I know little about the law, but it seems anything Congress does can be challenged to the Supreme Court. Hypothetically, what if a majority opposed expansion. It wouldn't matter how ridiculous the majority decision is would it?

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can the Supreme Court block expansion of the Supreme Court? (Original Post) Flaleftist Oct 2020 OP
It's a matter for Congress. DonaldsRump Oct 2020 #1
I thought about this and I don't know the answer either. Claustrum Oct 2020 #2
Not legally. Court size is not defined in the Constitution... Wounded Bear Oct 2020 #3
I was just asking my husband the same bamagal62 Oct 2020 #4
no qazplm135 Oct 2020 #5
Right lagomorph777 Nov 2020 #14
No. PTWB Oct 2020 #6
It would be a so-called "Constitutional crisis" if they tried. But for the case to get there you'd RockRaven Oct 2020 #7
And in order to have standing they would have been seated MoonlitKnight Nov 2020 #13
+ struggle4progress Nov 2020 #17
No Karma13612 Oct 2020 #8
This! Thekaspervote Oct 2020 #10
The size was previously changed 7 times Cicada Oct 2020 #9
I posed the same question. BUT, when you think about it, does it really matter? Just ignore them. Goodheart Oct 2020 #11
That pretty much sums it up. GulfCoast66 Nov 2020 #12
Nope - Congress is explicitly authorized in Article 3, to set size and scope for SCROTUS. lagomorph777 Nov 2020 #15
No. roamer65 Nov 2020 #16

Claustrum

(4,845 posts)
2. I thought about this and I don't know the answer either.
Sat Oct 31, 2020, 10:52 PM
Oct 2020

But wouldn't it be the biggest "conflict of interest" ever?

And we've expanded the supreme court before, it just hasn't been done in a long time.

Wounded Bear

(58,574 posts)
3. Not legally. Court size is not defined in the Constitution...
Sat Oct 31, 2020, 10:52 PM
Oct 2020

They can't "shrink" it by firing Justices, but expansion is up to Congress, by statute.

Of course, Repubs will try to block it in the courts, I guess.

RockRaven

(14,873 posts)
7. It would be a so-called "Constitutional crisis" if they tried. But for the case to get there you'd
Sat Oct 31, 2020, 10:58 PM
Oct 2020

need a lawsuit from a party with standing to make it to SCOTUS before Biden nominates and the Senate confirms and they swear in enough justices to make a difference (yes, such a case would be fast-tracked, but it still wouldn't happen overnight, and the Barret nomination provides precedent for rushing noms through). There is no un-ringing of the bell, so to speak once they're sworn in.

Karma13612

(4,536 posts)
8. No
Sat Oct 31, 2020, 11:02 PM
Oct 2020

The Supreme Court can’t govern itself.

the Legislature decides who and how many constitute the court.

As far as I know.

Goodheart

(5,307 posts)
11. I posed the same question. BUT, when you think about it, does it really matter? Just ignore them.
Sat Oct 31, 2020, 11:08 PM
Oct 2020

Just seat however many we like. What are they going to do about it? Pray to Jesus for an intervention?

President Biden: "Sorry, but we don't accept your authority in this matter. Meet your new associates. Deal with it."

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
12. That pretty much sums it up.
Sun Nov 1, 2020, 12:25 AM
Nov 2020

It been done many times. Originalist should love it!

The constitution spells it out. Congress and the president decides the number on the court.

Big fan of 13 here.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
15. Nope - Congress is explicitly authorized in Article 3, to set size and scope for SCROTUS.
Sun Nov 1, 2020, 12:39 AM
Nov 2020

Article III
Section 1
The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

Section 2
The Judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;---to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;---to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;---to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;---to Controversies between two or more States;---between a State and Citizens of another State;---between Citizens of different States,---between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.

In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be a Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can the Supreme Court blo...