General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOK. I choose Kornacki over King.
They have King talking too long at a time. He repeats and repeats and repeats. And when he compares Hilary to Biden he switches screens. I can't remember what the first figures were. Kornacki just tells you.
What do you think?
tia
las
hlthe2b
(113,201 posts)Honestly, Willie is so much calmer and gets the point across.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)LiberalArkie
(19,480 posts)that's hilarious!
Claustrum
(5,056 posts)It's easier to listen to him now.
Under The Radar
(3,429 posts)Marthe48
(22,862 posts)n/t
Tommy_Carcetti
(44,446 posts)Much better than the cables.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Tribalceltic
(1,000 posts)and the hell with 2016 references!
OAITW r.2.0
(31,731 posts)Not a popular opinion here, but he is pretty damn good at drill down analysis. And he's mastered the touchscreen breakdown.
mcar
(45,813 posts)It was making me crazy.
FakeNoose
(40,730 posts)Some people don't like his style I guess. But he does excellent research and he makes these dry races interesting, or at least he tries to make them so. Kornacki is doing a job that nobody else really wants, and he does it pretty well.
cachukis
(3,751 posts)UTUSN
(77,302 posts)KING and BLITZER were doddering bozos. Sometimes KING seemed to be rambling and talking to himself.
At ABC, the young dude with the numbers was just a less competent version of KORNACKI. Went back to MSNBC.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)But Kornacki is driving me crazy.
