SCOTUS can't do what he will ask of them

[intrepidity]

He'll try, but be clear: it's to send a message to his 'boys' on hold.

[still_one]

1. He is going to tell them to invalidate the mail-in ballots in Pennslvania.

[Hassin Bin Sober]

3. At least the ballots that come in after today.

The SC deadlocked on the Pa extended deadline.

Ari Berman thinks they might take another bite at the apple.

Meanwhile the repigs will try and invalidate any ballot with a smudged postmark

[still_one]

9. He is talking any mail in votes that were received two weeks ago. Hassin. This is

outrageous. There are millions of votes still uncounted, and trump is falsely declaring himself winner

He says we will be going to the SC to stop all voting

WTF

[NYC Liberal]

2. Not even this SCOTUS will do it. There is zero justification.

[sabbat hunter]

5. at least 4 will

Amy Coney Barrett, Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh. Gorush is a toss up. Roberts will reject what Trump is pushing.

[Hoyt]

4. Don't believe even the stacked SC will support trump.

[still_one]

10. It sure shouldn't. How voting is done is determined by the states, NOT the SC, or

trump

[no_hypocrisy]

6. I don't see how the USSC can invalidate the votes of an entire state during a pandemic.

[TreasonousBastard]

11. Me neither. But, what happens if they do?

[msongs]

7. why not the majority is loyal to him not the constitution nt

[BusyBeingBest]

8. It completely thwarts democracy. To suggest that states stop counting

the votes once it appears he's winning...fucking crazypants. Like kicking the monopoly board across the room in the middle of the game and declaring yourself the winner.

[helpisontheway]

12. They would be more likely to do some sneaky shit

like that if he did not announce it in advance. Roberts is probably pissed.

[joshcryer]

13. It is 100% to get his "boys" to go to the polling locations...

...where the counting is happening and spoil shit. Burn it down. No votes counted.