General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf you think that polling is bunk, then why are you wearing a mask?
Polling (really sampling) is a cornerstone of the scientific method. The same underlying mathematics that says wearing a mask lowers contagion from covid-19 is the same underlying mathematics that used to sample voter preferences for an upcoming election.
And just like there's a margin of error in the projections of health benefits from wearing a mask, there too is a margin of error in election polling.
EVERY polling outfit got it wrong. Every one of them. And not only did they get it wrong, but their margin of errors always favored Trump. EVERY time.
Now, you could rightly say that the methodolgies of the pollsters are deeply flawed, but we didn't see this in 2018 nor for any other previous election except for 2016. Something is not right with this vote.
Be careful when you dismiss polling because that same argument can be used against you when people question wearing a mask or social distancing. It's all the same math.
Ace Rothstein
(3,160 posts)A lot of them were actually quite a bit off. Mostly in the favor of Republicans but a few in our favor as well. FL was way off.
Yavin4
(35,433 posts)Ace Rothstein
(3,160 posts)Yavin4
(35,433 posts)Not fully, but so far, he's gotten the lion's share of it.
hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)incredibly difficult to accurately poll because of the volatility and extreme variances in subpopulations.
That hardly means ALL polls are unreliable. Like all science, it depends on the methods, the inputs, and the analysis--but most of all the consistency of validating studies, using similar, but not always identical methods.
Yavin4
(35,433 posts)Not all pollster use the same methodology. Some are landline only. Some are mobile. Some are online polls which are anonymous. All of them had it wrong. All.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Underrepresented and that not all pollsters had adjusted for this this go around.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)statistics and Algorithms used in polling are totally dependent on the inputs. Here in Nevada we are seeing in real time how data collected missed a critical aspect. The missing key seems to be the Covid impact and how it is and did effect the Dem Party vote totals.
Some how People think the Gaming Industry can just throw the doors open and flip a switch and we are back to pre Covid economic status. And the Votes seem to track that false Narrative. Sad to say,people oft times vote against their best interests.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)It pretty consistently predicted the result in Ohio.
Turin_C3PO
(13,964 posts)the possibility of vote flipping, I think its just hard in this volatile atmosphere to get a true reading from the polls. That doesnt change the fact that election insecurity has to be addressed.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)At their heart, polling firms are still making an estimate of mix of D/R/I voters in a voting population, in order to create their modeling.
My concern is that polling models aren't taking into account voter disenfranchisement. If they survey 500 Democrats for a likely voter poll, who fully intend to vote, but because of suppression efforts, only 475 of those Democrats are actually able to cast their ballot, then the poll may be overstating the Democratic response by 2%.
Sid
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Enthusiasm/GOHV ability that gave him a hidden boost. That he could win a place if he had a 45% (ironic #) approval. That was the magic number. Why I've closely followed his approval #s for four years. Last preelection avg on 538 was 44.6. in the end, this may indeed pan out. He came up slightly shy of 45 and he will end up slightly shy of winning too.
Many of his followers think he is a messiah. And he knows they will do what he asks. Preelection he was asking them to find 9 people and get them to go vote. Like if God came down and appeared to you and asked you to do something, you'd do it.