Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hedda_foil

(16,483 posts)
Wed Nov 4, 2020, 11:25 AM Nov 2020

Why didn't Hillary's team file for recounts in MI, WI and PA in 2016?

DU would have been all over that at the time but the site was down for nearly 3 weeks. The margins in those states was razor thin. Why did they just let the pig claim them all.

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why didn't Hillary's team file for recounts in MI, WI and PA in 2016? (Original Post) hedda_foil Nov 2020 OP
I seem to remember a recount in MI in 2016 yodermon Nov 2020 #1
I remember a Wisconsin recount because of that idiot Rice4VP Nov 2020 #4
I believe Stein asked for a recount SomedayKindaLove Nov 2020 #13
Recounts never change the outcome Thrill Nov 2020 #2
Perhaps They Understood The Realities, Ma'am The Magistrate Nov 2020 #3
Lol flying rabbit Nov 2020 #8
There is razor thin and then really razor thin. Statistical Nov 2020 #5
Because she lost and was grown-up enough to admit it BeyondGeography Nov 2020 #6
See above. Because they were realists. stopdiggin Nov 2020 #7
Because unless you are willing to throw out a lot of ballot during recount, Claustrum Nov 2020 #9
Jill Stein asked for a recount in WI. 33taw Nov 2020 #10
Jinx! BumRushDaShow Nov 2020 #12
Jill Stein did the honor BumRushDaShow Nov 2020 #11

SomedayKindaLove

(1,018 posts)
13. I believe Stein asked for a recount
Wed Nov 4, 2020, 11:45 AM
Nov 2020

But the judge said she couldn’t ask for one because it wouldn’t change the election for her.

At that trial the Clinton lawyers did not ask for a recount, saying they were only there to observe.

The Magistrate

(96,043 posts)
3. Perhaps They Understood The Realities, Ma'am
Wed Nov 4, 2020, 11:28 AM
Nov 2020

Fond as I am of this forum, I doubt it would have made much difference if members here were 'all over' something.

Statistical

(19,264 posts)
5. There is razor thin and then really razor thin.
Wed Nov 4, 2020, 11:29 AM
Nov 2020

90%+ of recounts result in no change. Most the successful recounts have been on margins below 0.1%. Clinton was down by far more than that.

I think it is incredibly unlikely that a recount would have made any difference. Also didn't that piece of shit Stein sucker everyone's money to do a recount and it has essentially negligible effect.

BeyondGeography

(39,963 posts)
6. Because she lost and was grown-up enough to admit it
Wed Nov 4, 2020, 11:30 AM
Nov 2020

Those results squared with a broader pattern of Trump over performing in rural areas, narrowing margins in swing districts that we won and flipping districts that we won in 2012. Let's say she fought it and he won anyway (which he would have). That's called a terrible use of political capital. She chose to let us move on and not make a martyr out of Trump. I'm glad she did.

stopdiggin

(12,638 posts)
7. See above. Because they were realists.
Wed Nov 4, 2020, 11:31 AM
Nov 2020

It wouldn't have made any difference.
(and because Clinton had the history and demeanor of a public servant -- rather than a narcissistic ideologue)

Claustrum

(5,014 posts)
9. Because unless you are willing to throw out a lot of ballot during recount,
Wed Nov 4, 2020, 11:33 AM
Nov 2020

it isn't going to change the result too much. Republican do that and democrats don't.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why didn't Hillary's team...