Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lady Freedom Returns

(14,120 posts)
Thu Nov 5, 2020, 10:09 PM Nov 2020

NBCNEWS: The FDA's cutoff for Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness is 50 percent. What does that mean?

The FDA's cutoff for Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness is 50 percent. What does that mean?
No vaccine is 100 percent effective, but some work better than others.

Nov. 3, 2020, 2:58 AM MST
By Jacqueline Stenson


Over the summer, the Food and Drug Administration announced that in order for an experimental Covid-19 vaccine to get the green light, it would need to be safe and “prevent disease or decrease its severity in at least 50 percent of people who are vaccinated.”

In fact, no vaccine is 100 percent effective, but some work better than others. One of the most successful is the measles vaccine — two doses are 97 percent effective in preventing the disease, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Still, 50 percent sounds like a far cry from 97 percent.

“I know that 50 percent does sound low but that is still some protection, and some protection is better than no protection,” said Dr. Jeff Kwong, professor of public health and family medicine and interim director of the Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases at the University of Toronto.

Read more @ https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/fda-s-cutoff-covid-19-vaccine-effectiveness-50-percent-what-n1245506



14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

dflprincess

(28,072 posts)
3. I'm assuming that's 50% successful at giving immunity?
Thu Nov 5, 2020, 10:13 PM
Nov 2020

If that's the case, we could hope that the vaccine would at least make a bout of it less harmful.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
4. I'd also be concerned with how long it is effective.
Thu Nov 5, 2020, 10:15 PM
Nov 2020

My bud at work had covid pretty bad in late February - tested recently to have no anti-bodies now.

Ms. Toad

(33,992 posts)
5. It means they are happy with a vaccine that is slightly more effective
Thu Nov 5, 2020, 10:17 PM
Nov 2020

than the seasonal flu vaccine is (on average).

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
10. I believe that it is safe to say that the only "seasonal" aspect to
Thu Nov 5, 2020, 10:23 PM
Nov 2020

SARS-COV-2 is that it transmits more efficiently when cold weather pack people together. It doesn’t go away because the weather gets warmer, like the flu does.

SARS-COV-2 acts like it’s biological cousins, the common cold viruses, a person can catch a cold anytime of year.

Ms. Toad

(33,992 posts)
12. seasonal influenza, not seasonal COVID.
Thu Nov 5, 2020, 10:27 PM
Nov 2020

The seasonal influenza vaccine is, on average, less than 50% effective.

I was providing a comparison for the OP who wanted to know what 50% effective meant.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
14. I understood your point.
Thu Nov 5, 2020, 10:33 PM
Nov 2020

Maybe it is just me showing uncertainty about SARS-COV-2. It seems that a person must be on the defensive against it at all times. One concern that I have is a vaccine may give people a false sense of defense if the rollout of the vaccine and education of the public doesn’t go hand in hand with the vaccine rollout.

I know that I plan to wear my masks until there is a sure thing relative to the virus.

dawg day

(7,947 posts)
7. I think some years the flu shot is only about 50% effective.
Thu Nov 5, 2020, 10:18 PM
Nov 2020

It's not ideal, but now that we're better about hygiene and wearing masks, it will probably be enough to prevent many infections.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
11. I don't know much about vaccine statistics. But I am concerned with
Thu Nov 5, 2020, 10:24 PM
Nov 2020

that low of a threshold for something as dangerous as SARS-COV-2.

crickets

(25,952 posts)
13. It means Fauci really wanted 70-75% efficacy and we're not going to get it,
Thu Nov 5, 2020, 10:31 PM
Nov 2020

at least not right now and not from this vaccine.

June
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/28/health/fauci-coronavirus-vaccine-contact-tracing-aspen/index.html

Sept
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucejapsen/2020/09/25/fauci-we-just-have-to-hang-in-there-just-a-bit-longer-for-a-vaccine/?sh=5122843b427c

Whether 50% is still better than nothing, it seems like it would be.

From the article in the OP:

Even if the first generation of Covid-19 vaccines aren’t as effective as hoped, Hotez said he’s not planning to pass up any of them. There might be the possibility he could get a booster later or even receive a different, more effective vaccine at some point, he said. For now, though, he would take what he can get.

“I would feel much better knowing that I got vaccinated and have some levels of virus-neutralizing antibody in my system,” he said. “Even if it’s not the best vaccine, it still could prevent me from going to the hospital or worse.”


I reserve judgement until I see the sticker price.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NBCNEWS: The FDA's cutoff...