**Breaking** Fed judge in PA denies GOP effort to toss ballots that initially contained errors

[hlthe2b]

No surprise, but good news, nonetheless

Link to tweet

[Ohiogal]

1. What will they try next...

Toss out all ballots that have coffee stains on them?

[Kahuna]

12. Trump is like Wile E Cyote with props from Acme that keep blowing up in his face...

[Ohiogal]

14. Aw!

Don’t insult Wile E.!

[iluvtennis]

16. LOL. :-)

[Budi]

2. "On to the Supreme Court!!", they screeched

It won't make any difference.
Trump's hand picked SC can't save him.

[NYC Liberal]

4. I really want them to appeal to SCOTUS and get denied.

Please let it happen.

[Budi]

9. They'd never get over it!!

[Xipe Totec]

13. ... the plaintiffs having moved to withdraw the motion... Sounds like they backed down. nt

[Shrike47]

15. The judge didn't toss the motion, the plaintiffs withdrew it. Big difference. Nothing to appeal.

[soothsayer]

3. Big dumdums

[BusyBeingBest]

5. Welp, there goes that avenue, lol.

[TheFarseer]

6. Sorry I'm a little behind

What is meant by “contained errors”?

[BusyBeingBest]

7. Probably mismatched address or signatures that don't quite match up or something.

[hlthe2b]

8. Things like failure to sign or date or (in PA, include the privacy sleeve), discrepancy of address

etc.

[alwaysinasnit]

10. The thing that caught my eye was "the plaintiffs having moved to withdraw the motion."

(Temporary Restraining Order)

[lindysalsagal]

11. So stupid. It wouldn't have been more than a handful. It wouldn't have mattered.

Completely pointless. But of course, that's how this narcissist rolls.

[warmfeet]

17. Fuck tRump!

His enablers as well.

[BobTheSubgenius]

18. Not a great start for running the table, is it?

Pile it on!!!