General Discussion

In It to Win It

(8,222 posts) Sat Nov 7, 2020, 10:00 AM Nov 2020

They are pushing the narrative that the Penn SOS wasn't already segregating the disputed ballots and

SCOTUS had to force them to do it.

The fact that the Pennsylvania SOS was already segregating the ballots is nowhere in the discussion DESPITE THE FACT THAT IF YOU READ ALITO’S ORDER IT SAYS TO CONTINUE DOING WHAT THE STATE SOS HAS ALREADY DIRECTED.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

They are pushing the narrative that the Penn SOS wasn't already segregating the disputed ballots and (Original Post) In It to Win It Nov 2020 OP

SHUT IT, LOSERS. bullimiami Nov 2020 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Nov 2020 #2

Just a prudential preservation of the status quo. (And that status quo turns out to be very bad for soothsayer Nov 2020 #3

Infuriating fascist propaganda, but no different than how the RW argues Dark n Stormy Knight Nov 2020 #4

Aren't this "they" of which you speak the losers of this election? Nuff said... abqtommy Nov 2020 #5

Absolutely! I just wanted to note the absurdity 😂 In It to Win It Nov 2020 #6

bullimiami

(13,067 posts)

1. SHUT IT, LOSERS.

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Sat Nov 7, 2020, 10:01 AM

Nov 2020

Response to In It to Win It (Original post)

Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.

soothsayer

(38,601 posts)

3. Just a prudential preservation of the status quo. (And that status quo turns out to be very bad for

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Sat Nov 7, 2020, 10:12 AM

Nov 2020

Link to tweet

?s=21

Neal Katyal
@neal_katyal
I would enter the order Justice Alito just entered, too. It means nothing. Just a prudential preservation of the status quo. (And that status quo turns out to be very bad for one Donald Trump.)