They are pushing the narrative that the Penn SOS wasn't already segregating the disputed ballots and

[In It to Win It]

SCOTUS had to force them to do it.

The fact that the Pennsylvania SOS was already segregating the ballots is nowhere in the discussion DESPITE THE FACT THAT IF YOU READ ALITO’S ORDER IT SAYS TO CONTINUE DOING WHAT THE STATE SOS HAS ALREADY DIRECTED.

[bullimiami]

1. SHUT IT, LOSERS.

[soothsayer]

3. Just a prudential preservation of the status quo. (And that status quo turns out to be very bad for

Link to tweet

?s=21

Neal Katyal
@neal_katyal
I would enter the order Justice Alito just entered, too. It means nothing. Just a prudential preservation of the status quo. (And that status quo turns out to be very bad for one Donald Trump.)

[Dark n Stormy Knight]

4. Infuriating fascist propaganda, but no different than how the RW argues

every point. I'm sure they couldn't name them any more than I could, but they are otherwise experts in the use of logical fallacies.

[abqtommy]

5. Aren't this "they" of which you speak the losers of this election? Nuff said...

[In It to Win It]

6. Absolutely! I just wanted to note the absurdity 😂