Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRecounts rarely change election outcomes ever
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/recounts-rarely-reverse-election-results/From 2016
Recounts typically dont swing enough votes to change the winner. Out of 4,687 statewide general elections between 2000 and 2015, just 27 were followed by recounts, according to data compiled by FairVote, a nonpartisan group that researches elections and promotes electoral reform. Just three of those 27 recounts resulted in a change in the outcome, all leading to wins for Democrats: Al Frankens win in Minnesotas 2008 U.S. Senate race, Thomas M. Salmons win in Vermonts 2006 auditor election and Christine Gregoires win in Washingtons 2004 gubernatorial race.
Recounts also typically dont change the margin by an amount that would be large enough to affect the result of this years presidential election. The mean swing between the top two candidates in the 27 recounts was 282 votes, with a median of 219. The biggest swing came in Floridas 2000 presidential election recount, when Al Gore cut 1,247 votes off George W. Bushs lead, ultimately not enough to flip the state to his column. In each state Trump won or leads in, his advantage is more than 10,000 votes, according to counts to far. Some statewide races that have undergone recounts have far fewer votes than the closest states in the 2016 presidential race, but even in percentage terms, the average swing was 0.2 percentage points, which could be enough to flip Michigan but not any other states (and therefore not the Electoral College; even with Michigan, Clinton would be 22 electoral votes short of the 270 needed to win).
You basically need to be within a few hundred votes, counts in the thousands and 10's of thousands do not get overturned.
Trump is not going to waste money paying for a recount.
Pa +38K+
WI +20K
GA +10K
A recount is not going to overturn those.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 291 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Recounts rarely change election outcomes ever (Original Post)
sunonmars
Nov 2020
OP
While true, don't underestimate the length Trumpers will go to throw out the ballots
Claustrum
Nov 2020
#1
Claustrum
(4,845 posts)1. While true, don't underestimate the length Trumpers will go to throw out the ballots
and/or find some "irregularity" to call the whole election rigged.
Soxfan58
(3,479 posts)2. Georgia!
Welcome to our latest Blue State.