Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lapucelle

(18,239 posts)
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:10 PM Nov 2020

Clyburn: Things Like 'Defund the Police' Did NOT Help Dems During Election, I Believe It Hurt

Jaime Harrison’s Senate Race.

[C]lyburn is making it clear that he thinks some of the rhetoric from more liberal Democrats hurt candidates in the election by allowing Republicans to tie things like “defund the police” to them.

On Meet the Press Sunday, Clyburn told Chuck Todd that he’s convinced Joe Cunningham and Jaime Harrison lost in his state of South Carolina because of “defund the police.”

“Jaime Harrison started to plateau when ‘Defund the Police’ showed up with a caption on TV right across his head,” Clyburn said. “That stuff hurt Jaime. And that’s why I spoke out against it a long time ago.”

“I just hope that going forward, we will think about each one of these congressional districts and let people represent their district,” he added. “Let’s recognize that people should reflect that diversity in our country.”

https://www.mediaite.com/election-2020/clyburn-things-like-defund-the-police-did-not-help-dems-during-election-i-believe-it-hurt-jaime-harrisons-senate-race/
41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clyburn: Things Like 'Defund the Police' Did NOT Help Dems During Election, I Believe It Hurt (Original Post) lapucelle Nov 2020 OP
The Republicans used the defund the police crap up and down the ballot DURHAM D Nov 2020 #1
Republicans used here in NY to very "good" effect. lapucelle Nov 2020 #3
Here in PA too Freddie Nov 2020 #11
'Defund' was a completely poor choice of word. It should have been reorganize or reprioritize or som keithbvadu2 Nov 2020 #2
Yes "Defunders" were zentrum Nov 2020 #4
You're right and it doesn't just apply to this issue MustLoveBeagles Nov 2020 #13
Never did figure out who started... stillcool Nov 2020 #5
Did republicans frame that debate? SergeStorms Nov 2020 #6
I agree I don't know where it came from in the first place but that hurt us bad doc03 Nov 2020 #7
I think activists used it first, but the actual origin of the term is unclear. lapucelle Nov 2020 #12
I agree it really gave fuel to the right wingers kimbutgar Nov 2020 #8
Repeat... sorry keithbvadu2 Nov 2020 #9
Fully AGREE bluestarone Nov 2020 #10
Georgia and 2022 exboyfil Nov 2020 #15
I was just telling my daughter that Biden and the other Democratic candidates exboyfil Nov 2020 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author pinkstarburst Nov 2020 #24
The sons of bitches keep denying it wellst0nev0ter Nov 2020 #32
Which Democrats ran on a platform of Defunding the Police? PTWB Nov 2020 #16
0casio-Cortez ran on it in NY 14. lapucelle Nov 2020 #18
No she didn't. PTWB Nov 2020 #25
Yes she did. It's on her official campaign website ... the one you linked to. lapucelle Nov 2020 #31
Wrong. PTWB Nov 2020 #35
A0C ran on defunding the police. It's on her the platform page of her campaign website. lapucelle Nov 2020 #37
AOC had a counter argument zipplewrath Nov 2020 #17
This counter argument? lapucelle Nov 2020 #23
Talking about an issue or a movement isn't the same as running on it. PTWB Nov 2020 #26
A0C's support of "defunding the police" is on her official campaign website. lapucelle Nov 2020 #28
Right. PTWB Nov 2020 #33
"Alexandria strongly supports: Defunding police and investing in healthcare, housing, education, lapucelle Nov 2020 #36
Are you still struggling with this? PTWB Nov 2020 #39
It's important that folks research a candidate's platform as articulated, lapucelle Nov 2020 #40
This is awesome! PTWB Nov 2020 #41
I literally remember screaming at the tv when I heard defund ebbie15644 Nov 2020 #19
The protests were the root problem. gulliver Nov 2020 #20
"Defund the police" was a poor choice of slogan for a grab bag PufPuf23 Nov 2020 #21
This should have been self evident. tritsofme Nov 2020 #22
Republican candidates up and down the ballot used that in their ads MineralMan Nov 2020 #27
Perhaps my memory is failing sarisataka Nov 2020 #29
They didn't support defunding the police andym Nov 2020 #30
That's Clyburn's point. lapucelle Nov 2020 #34
The bigger problem is loyalsister Nov 2020 #38

DURHAM D

(32,609 posts)
1. The Republicans used the defund the police crap up and down the ballot
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:15 PM
Nov 2020

in rural red America. By that I mean from a U.S. Senate race down to County Commissioner.

lapucelle

(18,239 posts)
3. Republicans used here in NY to very "good" effect.
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:18 PM
Nov 2020

It cost us both state assembly and congressional seats.

Freddie

(9,258 posts)
11. Here in PA too
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:31 PM
Nov 2020

Biden won my county but our Repug Congressman was re-elected handily after his attack ads on his opponent, tying her to riots and “defunding the police.” We gotta work on better messaging.

keithbvadu2

(36,747 posts)
2. 'Defund' was a completely poor choice of word. It should have been reorganize or reprioritize or som
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:17 PM
Nov 2020

'Defund' was a completely poor choice of word. It should have been reorganize or reprioritize or something like that.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
4. Yes "Defunders" were
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:18 PM
Nov 2020

…..always explaining that they meant "reform", "retrain", "relocate" funds to mental health responders.

Any term that you have to explain so much is not working.

They had months to change it. May have cost us a lot of seats.

MustLoveBeagles

(11,587 posts)
13. You're right and it doesn't just apply to this issue
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:33 PM
Nov 2020

The bottom line is that if you have to explain your losing. A lot of voters don't have the time or the will to study the issues in depth. Unfortunately that hurts us and helps Republicans. Fox news and OAN along with thousands of hate radio stations amplifying their framing doesn't help us either. Many voters just aren't that bright and believe the lies.

stillcool

(32,626 posts)
5. Never did figure out who started...
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:23 PM
Nov 2020

the "Defund the Police" at protests. The picture of those signs damn near smothered the internet, and gave Donald and the GOP their pivot to "law & order". Every cable news station made just those words front and center. No questions of reforming, retraining, or any other way to fix the police. Just 'defund'. My fear may subside in time, but the anger at those responsible for distorting truth, and advancing and enhancing poppy-cock, knows no bounds.

SergeStorms

(19,192 posts)
6. Did republicans frame that debate?
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:23 PM
Nov 2020

I can't remember who came up with "defund", but it sounds like something the GOP would use to further scare voters. They're very good at stoking fear in voter's hearts.

doc03

(35,324 posts)
7. I agree I don't know where it came from in the first place but that hurt us bad
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:25 PM
Nov 2020

probably one of the main reasons why we lost seats in the House and didn't get the Senate.

lapucelle

(18,239 posts)
12. I think activists used it first, but the actual origin of the term is unclear.
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:32 PM
Nov 2020
What does 'defund the police' mean?

The rallying cry sweeping the US – explained

Activists have long advocated taking money from police and reinvesting it in services. The idea is now seeing a wave of support.


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/05/defunding-the-police-us-what-does-it-mean

bluestarone

(16,900 posts)
10. Fully AGREE
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:30 PM
Nov 2020

I believe it was said during the heat of the moment during the George Floyd protests, (which is understandable) but yea i don't think it helped us! We will figure it out. (WE better before 2024)

exboyfil

(17,862 posts)
14. I was just telling my daughter that Biden and the other Democratic candidates
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:33 PM
Nov 2020

should have forcefully said, "Hell no. We don't mean defund the police"

She is a mental health nurse and she doesn't want go out on 911 calls like some have suggested. She is trained to deal with unarmed patients, and she is still at daily risk.

On the other hand it enrages me that police have coopted the US Flag. How that got started is beyond me. It is wrong.

I have friends that our police. Many of us do. They do a hard job that requires a great deal of perception and empathy. They are not perfect and some are even criminal in their behavior, but that is a minority. They do need oversight and independent review. Cameras should be mandatory. They obviously need better training.

Response to exboyfil (Reply #14)

 

wellst0nev0ter

(7,509 posts)
32. The sons of bitches keep denying it
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 04:51 PM
Nov 2020

There was an apocryphal story in how Lyndon Johnson won his first campaign for office by having subordinates start a whisper campaign that his opponent has carnal relations with a pig. An advisor told Johnson he can't spread that rumor, Johnson said "No, we don't have to prove anything, we just need that sonuvabitch to deny it."

Constantly playing defense to Republican smears is not going to win you races. You tell voter that the goops are in bed with corrupt cops, nazis, racists and Proud Boys. People can whine about the left all they want, and they'll still lose because they don't know how to fight back against the real enemies.

 

PTWB

(4,131 posts)
16. Which Democrats ran on a platform of Defunding the Police?
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:37 PM
Nov 2020

Defunding the Police was a protest slogan (and a terrible one) that both missed the mark in terms of what it aimed to accomplish and provided the RW a weapon with which to cudgel Democrats across the country in tight races.

The problem is that we allow right wing media to pick up these protest slogans and chants and paint the entire Democratic Party with them. This is compounded by the fact that due to our decrepit education system, a huge portion of Americans have no critical thinking skills and are completely influenced by meaningless soundbites.

 

PTWB

(4,131 posts)
25. No she didn't.
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 04:02 PM
Nov 2020

Talking about the 'defunding the police' movement isn't the same as campaigning on a defunding the police platform. Neither is being supportive of their goals. Instead of listening to what people want to say she said, why don't you listen to her in her own words.




The only "anti-police" policy she's specifically calling for is the creation of a national registry of police officers who commit misconduct so that they can be easily tracked and neighboring jurisdictions have information about who they're hiring.


This is AOC's platform. THIS is what AOC ran on:

https://www.ocasiocortez.com/issues



  • MEDICARE FOR ALL - Guarantee healthcare for all people, curb costs, and improve long-term health.
  • HOUSING AS A HUMAN RIGHT - Protect current occupants, repair public housing, and build new affordable housing.
  • REAL PUBLIC SAFETY - Ending police violence and investing in people, not prisons.
  • HONOR IN IMMIGRATION - It is past time to make undocumented individuals full members of the country they call their home.
  • A JUST RECOVERY FOR PUERTO RICO - Provide real support to Puerto Ricans experiencing economic and environmental crises while respecting their right to define their own future.
  • ELEVATE PUBLIC EDUCATION - Strengthen our education system and make it affordable to all, so students are prepared for jobs.

lapucelle

(18,239 posts)
37. A0C ran on defunding the police. It's on her the platform page of her campaign website.
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 05:38 PM
Nov 2020

It's insulting to think that A0C didn't know the platform she detailed on her own campaign website.



https://www.ocasiocortez.com/issues

zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
17. AOC had a counter argument
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:37 PM
Nov 2020

It was rather length and detailed. But basically it was that the democrats don't engage in the proper ways to counter these arguments.
They run TV ads all day while the GOP runs social media and internet based campaigns telling their lies.

lapucelle

(18,239 posts)
23. This counter argument?
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:54 PM
Nov 2020
0casio-Cortez dismisses proposed $1B cut: 'Defunding police means defunding police'

Rep. Alexandria 0casio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said New York City’s proposed $1 billion cut from the police department budget tiptoes around demands from activists who are asking for a reduced police presence.

Though the plan proposed by New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio (D) cuts one-sixth of the New York Police Department (NYPD) budget, activists note that much of it would be transferred to other city departments, including the Department of Education, where it could pay for police in schools. Activists have advocated for removing officers from schools altogether.

“Defunding police means defunding police,” the congresswoman said in a statement. “It does not mean budget tricks or funny math. It does not mean moving school police officers from the NYPD budget to the Department of Education’s budget so the exact same police remain in schools.”


https://thehill.com/homenews/house/505307-ocasio-cortez-dismisses-proposed-1b-cut-defunding-police-means-defunding
 

PTWB

(4,131 posts)
26. Talking about an issue or a movement isn't the same as running on it.
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 04:05 PM
Nov 2020

There is a major issue with police monopolizing city resources. Talking about that issue is not wrong. The only anti-police policy she actually campaigned on was creating a national registry of police officers who commit misconduct - so that they're not hired by neighboring jurisdictions and we can track them.

lapucelle

(18,239 posts)
28. A0C's support of "defunding the police" is on her official campaign website.
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 04:29 PM
Nov 2020
Alexandria strongly supports:

H.R.5070 - A Just Society: The Mercy In Re-entry Act;

H.Res. 702 - The People’s Justice Guarantee;

Defunding police and investing in healthcare, housing, education and other services;

Ending qualified immunity for police and making police misconduct records public;


https://www.ocasiocortez.com/issues#real-public-safety
 

PTWB

(4,131 posts)
33. Right.
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 05:03 PM
Nov 2020

I’m not going to be over critical here because I’m not sure how closely you follow politics.

In the same post you’re replying to I said, and I quote, “Talking about the 'defunding the police' movement isn't the same as campaigning on a defunding the police platform. Neither is being supportive of their goals.

I’m not sure if you were trying to have a “gotcha!” moment but I clearly acknowledge she supports their goals.

Anyway, in politics you something called a platform. You run on your platform. That’s what we’ve been discussing. AOC’s platform included the issues I mentioned above.

AOC’s platform did not promise to defund the police. She promised to work on creating a national registry of police officers who commit misconduct so that they cannot simply hop between departments and abuse minorities in the next town over.

You may not be aware of this but politicians have forever supported groups, ideas, and movements detached from their campaign promises and platforms.

If you can’t see the difference between “I think folks who want to defund the police have legitimate grievances” and “I am going to defund the police if you elect me”, well, I don’t know how to help you.

lapucelle

(18,239 posts)
36. "Alexandria strongly supports: Defunding police and investing in healthcare, housing, education,
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 05:23 PM
Nov 2020

and other services."

It's on her platform page. Click on the scales of justice icon (Real Public Safety) on her platform page, and the page expands. Didn't you read the details? I always read the fine print. Clicking on "learn more" is generally good policy when assessing a candidate.



*********************************************************************************************

Here's where folks can actually "learn more" about the details of the candidate's platform. That's why it says "learn more" in those little boxes on the page labeled "A0C's Platform: Key Issues".




*********************************************************************************************

https://www.ocasiocortez.com/issues



 

PTWB

(4,131 posts)
39. Are you still struggling with this?
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 05:53 PM
Nov 2020

You keep posting something that says she supports the thing I told you she supports. I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish with that but I'm happy that you agree with me, I guess? Politicians support movements, groups, ideas and positions - that support is separate from promises to do the things that those movements, groups, ideas and positions demand.



https://www.axios.com/aoc-democrats-digital-operation-bbb7fc6f-b370-478a-8984-900455437f49.html

Driving the news: After Democrats lost several key house races in divided districts, moderates were furious and pointing fingers at the progressive wing of the party. Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.), who is narrowly leading her Republican challenger, vented on a caucus call that Democrats should never "use the words socialist or socialism ever again."

What she's saying: "If you look at some of these some of the arguments that are being advanced, that 'defund the police hurt' or that arguments about socialism hurt, not a single member of Congress that I'm aware of campaigned on socialism or defunding the police in this general election," Ocasio-Cortez told CNN's "State of the Union."

"I believe that there are many areas that we can point at in centralized democratic operations that are extraordinarily weak. For example, our digital campaigning is very weak. This is an area where Republicans are actually quite strong."

"I believe that many Republicans were very effective at digital organizing strategy as well, whereas the Democratic Party is still campaigning largely as though it's 2005. And I know a lot of us don't want to hear this, but 2005 was 15 years ago. So we can do better."

Ocasio-Cortez told the New York Times earlier this week she tried to help swing district Democrats.

"And every single one of them, but five, refused my help. And all five of the vulnerable or swing district people that I helped secured victory or are on a path to secure victory."


lapucelle

(18,239 posts)
40. It's important that folks research a candidate's platform as articulated,
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 06:19 PM
Nov 2020

outlined, and detailed on the platform page of an official campaign website.

I'm sure A0C knew her own platform better than the pundits on Good Morning America. A0C can speak for herself. She doesn't need pundits (real or imagined) telling folks what she "really" meant.



https://www.ocasiocortez.com/issues#real-public-safety



 

PTWB

(4,131 posts)
41. This is awesome!
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 06:32 PM
Nov 2020

Despite completely failing to digest the post you were responding to, you managed to say something that totally supported it!

You wrote: "AOC can speak for herself."

AOC did speak for herself in the article I linked, which is accompanied by a video (if listening is easier for you than reading, since you refused to do that) - AOC said that she wasn't aware of a single candidate for who campaigned on socialism or defunding the police.

Surely you are not denying AOC the agency to determine what she herself campaigned on. Are you?

ebbie15644

(1,214 posts)
19. I literally remember screaming at the tv when I heard defund
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:46 PM
Nov 2020

The police. What was wrong with saying reform.

gulliver

(13,180 posts)
20. The protests were the root problem.
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:51 PM
Nov 2020

They went on too long and were not fronted by our first string messengers. So-called "protests" are an outmoded communication technology. Past a certain freshness date (maybe a day), they do nothing but massive damage to their own side. They let the Republicans choose the very most foolish on our side (looters and "defund the police" framing bunglers) as representing our side.

PufPuf23

(8,764 posts)
21. "Defund the police" was a poor choice of slogan for a grab bag
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:51 PM
Nov 2020

of issues for LE to better serve the people.

Bad initial impression of the protests and misleading by the corporate media.

One wonders about the provenance of the slogan and how, once noticed, the slogan was pushed by MSM.

Note how now the slogan is already being used by some Democrats against other Democrats.

tritsofme

(17,374 posts)
22. This should have been self evident.
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 03:54 PM
Nov 2020

That anyone legitimately thought that sort of framing would be anything but destructive is extremely puzzling.

MineralMan

(146,284 posts)
27. Republican candidates up and down the ballot used that in their ads
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 04:09 PM
Nov 2020

constantly, especially as the time before the election shrank. Was it successful for them? Perhaps in some cases, particularly in some House districts and state legislative races.

Never mind that none of those Democratic candidates promoted dismantling the police. It didn't matter. People on the fence saw that issue as something that Democrats wanted. It may have shifted some races toward the Republicans. Even in Minnesota, where the whole Defund the Police thing started, it proved very unpopular generally.

A bad choice of words, I believe.

sarisataka

(18,570 posts)
29. Perhaps my memory is failing
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 04:40 PM
Nov 2020

but wasn't this discussed through the summer and leading to the election? The consensus was reform has been tried and failed. We need to use defund and not to worry, it will help in the election more than harm.

The only point of contention was did defund equate to eliminate? Most agreed it did not mean entirely eliminate the police, though others insisted that is exactly what was meant.

andym

(5,443 posts)
30. They didn't support defunding the police
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 04:45 PM
Nov 2020

but the Right-wing propaganda and ad network pinned it on them anyway.

lapucelle

(18,239 posts)
34. That's Clyburn's point.
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 05:05 PM
Nov 2020
Congressman James Clyburn (D- SC) has been taking a victory lap of sorts, given how his endorsement of Joe Biden during the Democratic primary catapulted the former vice president towards the nomination and now the presidency.

But Clyburn is making it clear that he thinks some of the rhetoric from more liberal Democrats hurt candidates in the election by allowing Republicans to tie things like “defund the police” to them.

“Jaime Harrison started to plateau when ‘Defund the Police’ showed up with a caption on TV right across his head,” Clyburn said. “That stuff hurt Jaime. And that’s why I spoke out against it a long time ago.”

snip=======================================================================

“I just hope that going forward, we will think about each one of these congressional districts and let people represent their district,” he added. “Let’s recognize that people should reflect that diversity in our country.”

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
38. The bigger problem is
Sun Nov 8, 2020, 05:41 PM
Nov 2020

all the criticism that should be directed at a system of white supremacy is directed at oppressed people.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Clyburn: Things Like 'Def...