McConnell is laying the ground work for the supremes to get involved.

[KewlKat]

We’re in danger I fear.

[TwilightZone]

1. No, he's not.

John Roberts has been quite clear that courts don't determine election law. That was a pointed statement aimed directly at Trump and his minions.

[exboyfil]

13. And the other five?

I have a modicum of hope for Gorsuch, but the other four - they would sign up to put political opponents in gas chambers.

[TwilightZone]

16. The court isn't going to throw out their reputations and legacy for Donald Trump.

The hysteria around here is getting ridiculous. Trump's legal team is a bunch of incompetents. This is going nowhere, plus there's zero basis.

[exboyfil]

18. Did you ever thing you would see the GOP senior Senate leadership

behaving this way? Kavanaugh already made a hack opinion full of errors to just get the result he wanted.

[TwilightZone]

20. McConnell has behaved this way for 12 years.

I swear that people have been living under a rock.

[maxsolomon]

30. Great point. He understands how to de-stabilize an opponent while appearing to do nothing.

Like Putin, his goal is to weaken, to enhance internal conflict, to create an opening to exploit.

He knows Trump's toast, but why should he help Dems finish him off?

[Catherine Vincent]

21. Kavanaugh would

Mainly because he has no stellar reputation.

[Cosmocat]

31. Dude at least four of them would RELISH having this as their "legacy"

nm

[anneboleyn]

2. How is that? They don't step on to overrule at least five states. Ridiculous.

[exboyfil]

14. Three - PA and two others

It looks like they might go after PA, WI, and GA. Outside chance for AZ.

[Thekaspervote]

19. Links please

[exboyfil]

22. The rumblings they are doing in WI (see Trump's Tweet)

which has one of the lowest winning percentages. PA and GA are ongoing since they have been called the latest and also have tight margins. Same with AZ and NV.

I guess I don't have any links, but they have challenges going on in all these states.

[Thekaspervote]

25. Their claims are baseless. The lawsuits they have filed since the election are now 0-10

[Demsrule86]

3. Trump doesn't have the numbers so no.

[TDale313]

4. How exactly?

[CaliforniaPeggy]

5. I'd like to see some facts and background on this allegation. n/t

[Kashkakat v.2.0]

29. there are none, or it would have been posted

[helpisontheway]

6. Should have known something was up when someone said Barr entered his office about an hour ago. Nt

[flamingdem]

7. What is he doing..

Seems like he's running cover for Rump's ego and cult members.

Quoting Hillary "should not concede under any circumstances".

Hmmmm

[CentralMass]

8. McConnell is one evil sob.

[DarthDem]

9. No, he isn't

Not going to happen. There are no grounds. This isn't Florida 2000.

[servermsh]

10. These unfounded fear threads are not helpful

[AmericanCanuck]

23. +1

[demgrrrll]

11. Part of this is to keep a lid on Trump so he does not go completely nuts and spoil his chances in

Georgia. That is at least part of it.

[Eid Ma Clack Shaw]

12. I'm not sure Diana Ross is gonna solve this one

[DrToast]

15. +1

[OneGrassRoot]

33. *snort* n/t

[Thekaspervote]

17. Please stop.. or better yet take this anxiety producing post down!!

[BannonsLiver]

24. No, he's making sure Trump gets out and campaigns for Loeffler and Perdue.

Mitch looks out for Mitch.

[treestar]

26. They don't even have an issue

like hanging chads. How are they going to get anything from one state, let alone 5? The SCOTUS only decides legal questions appealed to them. They can't just decree the Dotard the winner.

[Brainfodder]

28. Nah, I'm thinking they are in danger.

Smarter folks will stop these dipshits, I'm counting on it!

Otherwise, yeah MOVING asap as if it's an option, during a pandemic made worse by same assholes.

[octoberlib]

32. Do you have a source? A link? Or is this just a conspiracy theory?

[SammyWinstonJack]

34. +1