Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
Mon Nov 9, 2020, 07:46 PM Nov 2020

Trump's "evidence" of voter fraud in MI was hearsay on a sticky note by an unknown poll worker.

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/11/trumps-campaign-presented-hearsay-written-on-a-sticky-note-in-court-as-evidence-of-voter-fraud/

The Washington Post has taken a look at some of the Trump campaign’s multiple failed efforts to get votes tossed out in several swing states, and one particularly egregious failure came in the state of Michigan, where the campaign’s evidence amounted to a piece of hearsay that had been scribbled onto a post-it note.

Specifically, Judge Cynthia Diane Stephens of the Michigan First District Court of Appeals last week rejected the Trump campaign’s efforts to halt the counting of absentee ballots in the state based on hearsay from a GOP election observer.

“In that case, a Republican election observer said she’d been given a sticky note by an unnamed poll worker, alleging that late-arriving ballots were being counted improperly,” the Post reports. “But she couldn’t provide the poll worker’s name or any other proof.”
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's "evidence" of voter fraud in MI was hearsay on a sticky note by an unknown poll worker. (Original Post) yellowcanine Nov 2020 OP
Love that one and the "nonzero number of people" in Pennsylvania underpants Nov 2020 #1
What to you want to bet its the same one who challenged a ballot because it was sticky DLCWIdem Nov 2020 #2
K&R Blue Owl Nov 2020 #3
Curiously written in Sharpie. C_U_L8R Nov 2020 #4
Was said Rethuglican election observer under oath? paleotn Nov 2020 #5
What the hell is a "sticky note" ? magicarpet Nov 2020 #6
A Post A Note. Pathwalker Nov 2020 #7
From Michigan on Nov. 5: Mc Mike Nov 2020 #8

underpants

(182,788 posts)
1. Love that one and the "nonzero number of people" in Pennsylvania
Mon Nov 9, 2020, 07:47 PM
Nov 2020

Pennsylvania and the "nonzero number of people" he has watching the count

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100214510612

Their argument: GOP observers had been barred from the rooms where the votes were being counted.

Republican observers were there, after all. Trump had “a nonzero number of people in the room,” one of his attorneys conceded in federal court Thursday evening.

“I’m sorry, then what’s your problem?” asked U.S. District Judge Paul S. Diamond, who denied the request to halt the count.

paleotn

(17,912 posts)
5. Was said Rethuglican election observer under oath?
Mon Nov 9, 2020, 07:54 PM
Nov 2020

Gawd, I hope so. That smacks of lying under oath. Judges usually take a really dim view of that. Just saying.

magicarpet

(14,145 posts)
6. What the hell is a "sticky note" ?
Mon Nov 9, 2020, 08:42 PM
Nov 2020

.... a cum wad tissue ?

The trDump lawyers took that to court as evidence for the judge to see ?


Mc Mike

(9,114 posts)
8. From Michigan on Nov. 5:
Tue Nov 10, 2020, 10:16 AM
Nov 2020

The only problems with trump’s suit, according to the judge, is that it was based on hearsay, brought the wrong party to court, couldn’t give the names of any of the ppl or locations they said broke the law and the relief sought is unavailable because the counting is over.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump's "evidence" of vot...