Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump's "evidence" of voter fraud in MI was hearsay on a sticky note by an unknown poll worker.
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/11/trumps-campaign-presented-hearsay-written-on-a-sticky-note-in-court-as-evidence-of-voter-fraud/The Washington Post has taken a look at some of the Trump campaigns multiple failed efforts to get votes tossed out in several swing states, and one particularly egregious failure came in the state of Michigan, where the campaigns evidence amounted to a piece of hearsay that had been scribbled onto a post-it note.
Specifically, Judge Cynthia Diane Stephens of the Michigan First District Court of Appeals last week rejected the Trump campaigns efforts to halt the counting of absentee ballots in the state based on hearsay from a GOP election observer.
In that case, a Republican election observer said shed been given a sticky note by an unnamed poll worker, alleging that late-arriving ballots were being counted improperly, the Post reports. But she couldnt provide the poll workers name or any other proof.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 966 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (19)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's "evidence" of voter fraud in MI was hearsay on a sticky note by an unknown poll worker. (Original Post)
yellowcanine
Nov 2020
OP
underpants
(182,788 posts)1. Love that one and the "nonzero number of people" in Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania and the "nonzero number of people" he has watching the count
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100214510612
Their argument: GOP observers had been barred from the rooms where the votes were being counted.
Republican observers were there, after all. Trump had a nonzero number of people in the room, one of his attorneys conceded in federal court Thursday evening.
Im sorry, then whats your problem? asked U.S. District Judge Paul S. Diamond, who denied the request to halt the count.
DLCWIdem
(1,580 posts)2. What to you want to bet its the same one who challenged a ballot because it was sticky
Blue Owl
(50,356 posts)3. K&R
C_U_L8R
(45,001 posts)4. Curiously written in Sharpie.
paleotn
(17,912 posts)5. Was said Rethuglican election observer under oath?
Gawd, I hope so. That smacks of lying under oath. Judges usually take a really dim view of that. Just saying.
magicarpet
(14,145 posts)6. What the hell is a "sticky note" ?
.... a cum wad tissue ?
The trDump lawyers took that to court as evidence for the judge to see ?
Pathwalker
(6,598 posts)7. A Post A Note.
Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)8. From Michigan on Nov. 5:
The only problems with trumps suit, according to the judge, is that it was based on hearsay, brought the wrong party to court, couldnt give the names of any of the ppl or locations they said broke the law and the relief sought is unavailable because the counting is over.