Ed Whelan: zero chance SCOTUS will give the election to Trump ... link

[Alhena]

Whelan is a very influential conservative judicial guru:

Link to tweet

[NRaleighLiberal]

1. so, how does one "alter the vote counts"?

[TwilightZone]

4. By invalidating votes

That seems to be their strategy. It's a non-starter.

[Thekaspervote]

2. TY for posting! Voices of sanity needed

[msongs]

3. hindenburg will never make hitler chancellor nt

[pat_k]

5. I think even the craziest crazy on the court would . . .

. . . fear a couple Republicans would cross over and vote to remove after the House impeaches them for treason if they were so blatant as to engineer some pretext for discounting so many votes. . . and when they are gone, Biden and a coalition of pro-democracy groups submit a case to set things right. And come Jan 20 we get to fill multiple seats.

[Statistical]

9. I think the crazies on the court fear open civil war and what that means for them.

When there is no government the justices are just nine feeble old people in robes. They aren't likely to far well in the asymmetric warfare that would come from a superpower tearing itself apart.

[world wide wally]

6. That would take some pretty strategic and selective counting

[Miguelito Loveless]

7. Once upon a time...

very smart people told me Trump wouldn’t be president.

Recently they told me Trump would lose in a landslide.

I am skeptical.

[dchill]

8. "...very influential conservative..."

I don't trust that stuff.

[Cha]

10. They fucking better NOT.