Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYTimes says Arizona and Georgia races are essentially over but haven't called them. (Original Post) triron Nov 2020 OP
Duh Iris Nov 2020 #1
So many loops to jump through.. any paragraphs for us, triron? Cha Nov 2020 #2
Three paragraphs from the story Maeve Nov 2020 #3
AZ doesn't recount at this margin. LisaL Nov 2020 #4
Just people being cautious because...2020 Maeve Nov 2020 #5
This explanation has been up for a week now Miguelito Loveless Nov 2020 #6
Oh TY Maeve.. glad I came back to the thread.. Cha Nov 2020 #7
Fox News called Arizona for Biden election night. n/t PoliticAverse Nov 2020 #8
Silver Lining: Donny is twisting in the wind... Blue Owl Nov 2020 #9

Maeve

(42,281 posts)
3. Three paragraphs from the story
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 06:51 PM
Nov 2020
Why haven’t some networks made a projection? It almost certainly does not reflect the view that Mr. Trump has a realistic chance to win. Instead, the networks are being cautious for a simple reason: The overall margin is less than a half-point — Mr. Biden has a 49.40 share of the vote, and Mr. Trump is at 49.06 — which is generally the threshold for a network projection. If it’s closer than that, the decision desks start to wonder about one-in-a-thousand possibilities, like an irregularity in the tabulated count or the kind of data entry troubles that plagued Florida in 2000.

Many news organizations — but not The A.P. — sometimes designate an “apparent” winner if a candidate appears to have clinched victory in a close election. It’s possible the networks will make that characterization once all of the votes are counted. But even if they don’t make a call, they’re just being cautious in a tight race. This one looks done.

(For most races, The New York Times automatically accepts the race calls made by The A.P. But in the most important ones, The Times sometimes takes a more conservative approach, as is the case here, particularly given the complexity of the voting in this pandemic year.)

Miguelito Loveless

(4,465 posts)
6. This explanation has been up for a week now
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 06:56 PM
Nov 2020

Seems they are either afraid, or are just happy to draw it out

Blue Owl

(50,355 posts)
9. Silver Lining: Donny is twisting in the wind...
Thu Nov 12, 2020, 07:33 PM
Nov 2020

Vulnerable, breakable, reduced to a mere speck clinging for its life...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYTimes says Arizona and ...