Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsProject Veritas could face legal liability for postal worker's ballot fraud allegations, experts say
(Salon) APennsylvania postal worker who initially alleged that a postmaster had tampered with mail ballots an accusation embraced by Republicans as evidence of an unfair election told federal investigators in a recorded interview that his sworn affidavit had been written by Project Veritas, and that he could no longer stand by his statement.
After congressional investigators said on Tuesday that the postal worker, Richard Hopkins, had "completely" recanted his allegation, Project Veritas posted a video of Hopkins denying that he had done so.
"I'm here to say I did not recant my statements," Hopkins said in the video. "That did not happen."
The next day, Project Veritas posted a two-hour audio clip of Hopkins' interview with U.S. Postal Service investigators, apparently in the belief that it would bolster Hopkins' case and show that investigators had manipulated him into confessing.
The audio recording, which Hopkins himself made secretly and Salon has reviewed, does not indicate that, however. Hopkins repeatedly disavows any first-hand knowledge of misconduct by the postmaster, saying instead that his allegation was largely an assumption, drawn from pieces of a conversation he overheard amid the noise of a mail processing facility. ......(more)
https://www.salon.com/2020/11/14/project-veritas-could-face-legal-liability-for-postal-workers-ballot-fraud-allegations-experts-say/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 751 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (18)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Project Veritas could face legal liability for postal worker's ballot fraud allegations, experts say (Original Post)
marmar
Nov 2020
OP
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)1. Good
May their lives be filled with lawyers.
JDC
(10,117 posts)2. How is it only "could?" These guys deserve serious time
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)3. This is how RWers win all arguments in the eyes of fellow RWers.
The great majority of them have no concpt of reason-based argument. They just need to present something they pretend supports their argument, no matter how false, weak or illogical & claim they won.
If forced to actually debate issues subject to objective evaluation of the arguments, RWers would not win a single one.
dreamland
(964 posts)4. Instead of "could", change it to "should".
They've used up all their "Get out if jail" cards.
Gothmog
(144,936 posts)5. James O;Keefe is a convicted criminal already and this will be fun to watch