General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBay City (MI) woman signs affidavit in Trump campaign election lawsuit
This article shows she has no direct or first hand "proof" of voter fraud, which makes her the queen of hearsay. (I'll credit her with determination since the driving distance from Bay City to Detroit is 112 miles.)
Emphasis mine, and I'll post pertinent parts of the article, with a link at the bottom.
--------------------
When asked if the 77-78 million votes Joe Biden has received are flawed in some way, she says she believes so.
She took video of an election official explaining why more challengers were not allowed into the vote tabulating area, one of her complaints in the affidavit. She also believed more Democrat challengers were watching the vote count process than Republicans.
Of the five people at a table, there were four Democrats to one Republican, or non-partisan, she says. How does she know that? I was told from inside the ballot room, by a supervisor, she says.
She says she was concerned about how military votes were being counted as well. Eilf believes other possible illegal votes could shift the Michigan outcome to Trump.
I think there was that many votes not being looked at with challengers, she says.
https://www.abc12.com/2020/11/13/bay-city-woman-signs-affidavit-in-trump-campaign-election-lawsuit/
onecaliberal
(32,812 posts)Siwsan
(26,257 posts)And I only care because these people live amongst us.
onecaliberal
(32,812 posts)Making excuses and letting them get by with it is criminal in and of itself.
Siwsan
(26,257 posts)I have no doubt they would make any claim they think would help, and they do have some WILD imaginations.
blueinredohio
(6,797 posts)NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)But of course that is meaningless.
Siwsan
(26,257 posts)Happy Hoosier
(7,277 posts)Stallion
(6,474 posts)Beliefs (aka "upon information and belief" ) legally constitutes "no evidence" and is inadmissible
I have done literally hundreds of motions for summary judgments (trials by affidavits) and you very rarely see an attorney use those words because its an admission that you don't have sufficient facts to prove the allegation. If those words are used such evidence will be universally disregarded by the court.
Happy Hoosier
(7,277 posts)Not a lawyer here, but Ive always been fascinated by the law, and a good 90% of these affidavits look to be here-say. The rest appear to be statements of belief not corroborated by any evidence.
moose65
(3,166 posts)Biden won Michigan by almost 150,000 votes. Does she seriously believe that that many votes were shifted? Jeez.
The baloney that she believes should be laughed out of court.
Siwsan
(26,257 posts)It is becoming tiresome.
IllinoisBirdWatcher
(2,315 posts)roamer65
(36,745 posts)Our turnout was extremely high and very blue.
Washtenaw went 72 pct for Joe Biden.
cutroot
(875 posts)I wonder if the nurses know that they will be working harder because of this anti- masker