Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

onecaliberal

(36,594 posts)
Sun Nov 15, 2020, 02:32 PM Nov 2020

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (onecaliberal) on Sun Feb 16, 2025, 04:57 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) onecaliberal Nov 2020 OP
I know a little about tort law. Frasier Balzov Nov 2020 #1
I doubt it. It would be difficult to prove that the reporting MineralMan Nov 2020 #2
The families of 250,000 dead. onecaliberal Nov 2020 #3
OK, but my first statement is the real issue. MineralMan Nov 2020 #6
This would be a top story if it were a dem potus nothing else would exist. onecaliberal Nov 2020 #7
I believe Fox News used the false speech is free speech argument. gibraltar72 Nov 2020 #4
That would set a dangerous precedent. Jeebo Nov 2020 #5
Fairness and stop reporting opinions. Reports facts and what is actually onecaliberal Nov 2020 #8

Frasier Balzov

(4,944 posts)
1. I know a little about tort law.
Sun Nov 15, 2020, 02:35 PM
Nov 2020

And it doesn't sound like a cause of action of which I'm familiar.

MineralMan

(150,879 posts)
2. I doubt it. It would be difficult to prove that the reporting
Sun Nov 15, 2020, 02:36 PM
Nov 2020

directly led to the deaths. Further, if reporting was based on what some government officials said, the media would have no liability at all.

Finally, what group of people would form the class filing the suit?

 

onecaliberal

(36,594 posts)
3. The families of 250,000 dead.
Sun Nov 15, 2020, 02:37 PM
Nov 2020

MineralMan

(150,879 posts)
6. OK, but my first statement is the real issue.
Sun Nov 15, 2020, 02:42 PM
Nov 2020

I followed the media. All were reporting the number of cases and deaths. All reported on the suggested measures people could take against. All reported what the administration was saying, as well as what other experts were saying. Fox News did a terrible job of all that, but still reported the disease as it spread.

Trump is responsible for playing down the danger. What he said got reported, as well. The media is not legally responsible for telling people anything other than what is happening and what is being said about it. Morally responsible, yes, but not legally.

 

onecaliberal

(36,594 posts)
7. This would be a top story if it were a dem potus nothing else would exist.
Sun Nov 15, 2020, 02:52 PM
Nov 2020

Same for the crime spree the republicans engage in. The corporate media is murdering people by failing to report reality and facts. Not both sides bullshit and lies.

gibraltar72

(7,629 posts)
4. I believe Fox News used the false speech is free speech argument.
Sun Nov 15, 2020, 02:40 PM
Nov 2020

I think a judge also ruled that no one actually believed what Cucker Tarlson told them.

Jeebo

(2,554 posts)
5. That would set a dangerous precedent.
Sun Nov 15, 2020, 02:40 PM
Nov 2020

That would open up all kinds of possibilities for assaults on free speech rights. I think it would be far better to restore the fairness doctrine, or something like it, which would be kind of the opposite of what you are pondering.

-- Ron

 

onecaliberal

(36,594 posts)
8. Fairness and stop reporting opinions. Reports facts and what is actually
Sun Nov 15, 2020, 02:54 PM
Nov 2020

Happening. Nothing else. Stop the 24 hour breaking news fever.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...