General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRudy Giuliani: Losing election lawsuits is part of our plan 'to get it to the Supreme Court'
Published 2 mins ago on November 17, 2020By David Edwards
Rudy Giuliani, an attorney for the President Donald Trump, said on Tuesday that the Trump campaign is prepared to lose election lawsuits with the hope that one or more are heard by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Since election day, more than a dozen lawsuits brought on behalf of the president have failed to produce results. Giuliani talked about the losing streak during an interview with Fox Business host Maria Bartiromo.
Frankly, this is a case we would like to see get to the Supreme Court, Giuliani said of one lawsuit in Pennsylvania. So, you know, were prepared in some of these cases to lose and to appeal and to get it to the Supreme Court.
Youre not going to win every one of these, he continued. I dont want to say its because of a Democrat judge or whatever. Some of them are just as fair as anybody. But in some cases you win, in some cases you lose.
-snip-
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/11/rudy-giuliani-losing-election-lawsuits-is-part-of-our-plan-to-get-it-to-the-supreme-court/
joshcryer
(62,287 posts)What a pathetic hail mary.
lettucebe
(2,337 posts)Guess they don't care. It's not their money.
unblock
(52,438 posts)dware
(12,462 posts)"Rudy, you're an idiot, now get the fuck out of my courtroom with your bullshit".
Gothmog
(145,794 posts)dware
(12,462 posts)mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)But with THIS SCOTUS?
I gotta say ... who knows?
Gothmog
(145,794 posts)Filing lawsuit that have no evidence to support their claims means that the courts ultimately have no real jurisdition which is why all but one of these cases have been dismissed
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)Unless you count the one order on election day letting observers move slightly closer to the action.
Oh, or Justice Alito saying ... "Oh hey, you guys keep doing what you're already doing in Pennsylvania" wrt sequestering the later ballots.
True Blue American
(17,995 posts)unblock
(52,438 posts)Laelth
(32,017 posts)Whether or not the SCOTUS will actually hear one of these cases is another question altogether.
-Laelth
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,226 posts)It means that the Supreme Court doesn't have to take every case appealed to it, and it first has to make it through the threshold of certorari before it can even entertain arguments.
I don't see how the Supreme Court in good faith can give these clowns cert.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)I'm not.
Only positive thing is that Giuliani has said the quiet part out loud - they know SCOTUS is a fucked up partisan mess.
We can use that in the arguments to add more justices
Mike 03
(16,616 posts)But it's true, corporations and the religious right ("Project Blitz" ) have mastered the art of (sometimes intentionally) losing cases in order to get them before the SCOTUS. Senator Whitehouse has talked a lot about this.
So many of Trump's cases are being withdrawn, not appealed. I don't think the SCOTUS will hear any of these cases.
rso
(2,273 posts)It would be an infinitely better strategy for Rudy to win cases and then have democratic lawyers appeal to SCOTUS. His stupid admission of the game plan is not going to go over well with SCOTUS.
treestar
(82,383 posts)So this is one of the dumbest excuses for losing ever.
C_U_L8R
(45,031 posts)"I meant to lose. Yeah, that's the ticket."
liberal N proud
(60,351 posts)They get it to the Supreme Court and the Constitution is trashed
Gothmog
(145,794 posts)struggle4progress
(118,379 posts)RobinA
(9,903 posts)open in a rain storm was all part of the plan. I figured having to dry off my seat with towels would clean up that minor coffee spill. It didn't, but that WAS the plan.
Baked Potato
(7,733 posts)Not Electoral College. Not the popular vote. Courts, so he can claim he won if not for the corrupt courts.