Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLet's talk Supreme Court for a bit.
I cannot believe the SC wants anything more to do with RUMPY. So why can't they just IGNORE the lawsuits, that are filed on the election? Just sit on them. Can't they do that?
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Let's talk Supreme Court for a bit. (Original Post)
bluestarone
Nov 2020
OP
They can refuse to take cases if they think the lower courts ruled "correctly"...
Wounded Bear
Nov 2020
#2
Polybius
(21,631 posts)1. They certainly can
It takes 4 out of the 9 Justices to take up a case.
Wounded Bear
(63,980 posts)2. They can refuse to take cases if they think the lower courts ruled "correctly"...
They wouldn't even have to comment.
Sneederbunk
(17,352 posts)3. Will any of the lawsuits reach SCOTUS?
bluestarone
(21,639 posts)4. Think they are sitting on one now?
Have not decided. Just thinking they COULD do that to ALL of whatever come their way, pertaining to the bogus suits!!
