BREAKING: Trump will burn a stack of hundred-dollar bills!

[brooklynite]

Link to tweet

[LakeArenal]

1. Better get the $ up front.

Even Wanker said it’s not going to be worth it.

[arlyellowdog]

2. Just in some counties

[roamer65]

5. Equal protection violation it sounds like.

We should take it to the USSC under Bush v Gore.

[GopherGal]

11. This is the thought that sent me running to Marc Elias's Twitter account

but he makes no mention of challenging it:

Link to tweet

?s=20

IIRC, the Wisconsin law specifically allows partial recounts to be requested. That may be a difference from Florida 2000?

[joshcryer]

13. Absolutely.

That is what they should do. But the dems will probably ignore it.

[Pantagruel]

3. Wisc. been assured

Mexico will pay for it.

[Walleye]

4. Show me the money!$

[Yavin4]

6. Money upfront in cash.

No checks. No credito.

[RKP5637]

7. hmmmm... I guess tRump will pay for it with one of his personal post dated checks! n/t

[lark]

8. It's not his money so he doesn't care.

He would never pay this himself, too big of a fraud.

[joshcryer]

9. Called it.

The workers in WI thank Trump for their easy labor job counting ballots.

[roamer65]

10. ..

[Initech]

12. Hey let him burn through money.

[ffr]

14. Only a partial recount. They didn't get the necessary funds for a full recount.

And they haven't yet specified which areas they want counted. Decisions, decisions. Do they choose #20 or black or red?

DOH!