I saw that f&cker diGenova at the press conference standing with Giuliani

[Grasswire2]

And so now we are coming to know the names of the traitors driving this coup attempt. Same old f&ckers.

Mark Levin
Giuliani
di Genova (and presumably his wife Victoria Toensing)
Bannon
Mercers

I wonder if Kellyanne is involved -- she always was in the middle of the f*ckers.

Discuss, please.

[Sneederbunk]

1. List should include every RWNJ with a microphone.

[Greybnk48]

2. Yep, his wife Victoria was standing there too.

How long have these scumbags been at it now? Waaay too long. Same old fuckers.

[bobalew]

3. Boris & Natasha, from Bullwinkle...

[Grasswire2]

4. I wonder if people understand just how LONG diGenova has been a saboteur of democracy.

I'm thinking back to the time when he was appointed special counsel to look into the matter of the GHW Bush administration looking into the files of Bill Clinton to see if he had ever written a letter asking to renounce his US citizenship.

One paragraph from the report linked below:


2

On December 10, DOJ Criminal Division recommended to Attorney General William Barr that he seek appointment of an independent counsel and, on December 11, Barr asked this court to do so. On December 14, one day before the Independent Counsel Act then in effect expired, we appointed Joseph E. diGenova Independent Counsel with authority to investigate and prosecute violations of federal criminal law in connection with the search of Clinton's passport files. Id. at 6-7. IC diGenova's investigation began in December 1992 and ended in November 1995, with the release of his Final Report. In the Final Report, IC diGenova stated that he found no evidence warranting the criminal prosecution of anyone for their conduct in connection with the passport files search, the disclosure of information from the files, or State's investigation of the search. Id. at 377. Regarding Tamposi specifically, he stated that no prosecution was warranted under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, or the conspiracy statute, 18 U.S.C. § 371, because there was no conclusive evidence that Tamposi improperly disclosed information from Clinton's passport files or that she joined with others to commit any criminal act. Id. at 415-19.

[link:https://openjurist.org/84/f3d/1439/in-re-janet-g-mullins|