Supercut of an Arizona judge examining the affidavit collection process used by the Trump campaign.

[Nevilledog]

Link to tweet

Tweet text:
Rex Chapman🏇🏼
@RexChapman
Yesterday @kayleighmcenany and @RudyGiuliani were peddling a silly story.

Here’s a supercut of an Arizona judge examining the affidavit collection process used by the Trump campaign.

It yielded “lies and spam." he decided - & disallowed the affidavits...

[PJMcK]

1. Nice take down, your Honor (n/t)

[IsItJustMe]

2. Would not want to be a lawyer trying to defend this sewage.

In fact, I would suspect that something like this would follow a lawyer for years to come. I bet that lawyer will never want to go in front of this judge again. How embarrassing. I guess this is why so many law firms pulled out of this destruction of democracy.

[mr_lebowski]

3. Obviously the Clinton/Soros/Chavez consortium has his children in a dungeon somewhere on Cuba

It's the only possible explanation for this judge's clearly twisted (and highly partisan) logic!!!1!!

[crickets]

4. Serious question: why aren't any of these attorneys being reprimanded in some way

for blatantly wasting the court's time with worthless affidavits and baseless cases that do not show fraud?

[BootinUp]

5. lol. +1

[TomDaisy]

6. ouch. if that lawyer isn't a partner or sole practitioner...

he can expect to be shown the door at his firm I'm betting

[greenjar_01]

7. Trump lawyer: These affidavits were submitted under penalty of perjury

Judge: Sure, but so were a whole shitload you know to be false.

Trump lawyer: Er, um, er, um.


****************

The whole affidavit thing is weird - just solicit a bunch of idiots to make claims about the election? Moronic.

[TomSlick]

8. A Solomon come to judgment.