General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsProposal to Allow Non-Veteran Presidential Burials at Arlington Draws Pushback
A PROPOSED PENTAGON RULE CHANGE that would allow presidents and vice presidents who havent served in the military to be buried in Arlington National Cemetery has drawn blowback from some veterans and Democrats who see it as a bid to allow President Trump to eventually be buried there.
The comment period for the proposed rule change ended on Monday. Among the 1,800 comments are many from veterans saying that they didnt believe presidents and vice presidents who didnt serve in the military should be eligible, with many accusing the Pentagon of making the change to benefit Trump. I strongly feel that interment or inurnment in Arlington National Cemetery should be limited to those who actually served in the military to maintain the respect for their sacrifice, reads a typical comment.
A Defense Department official involved in the rule-making said the White House had had no involvement in the proposed rule, and said the presidential allowance was part of a monthslong debate that also resulted in the disqualification of reservists who didnt serve in combat. A senior administration official also denied that the White House had played a role. The rule change came as a result of a land-use review of Arlington, which is rapidly running out of space for burials. Illinois Democratic Sen. Tammy Duckworth has a bill that would prevent non-veteran presidents from being buried at Arlington, but it hasnt gained any traction in the Senate.
Two presidents are currently buried at Arlington: John F. Kennedy, a decorated World War II combat veteran, and William Howard Taft, who qualified because he served as secretary of war and chief justice of the Supreme Court.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/proposal-to-allow-non-veteran-presidential-burials-at-arlington-draws-pushback-11605868201 (subscription)
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Cannot bury traitor tRump among heroes!
Enterstageleft
(3,394 posts)soothsayer
(38,601 posts)onecaliberal
(32,777 posts)NBachers
(17,080 posts)LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,564 posts)I hate to stand in long lines.
Orange Buffoon
(188 posts)with quick cuts of actors like Alicia Silverstone saying "No."
lpbk2713
(42,736 posts)I'd make a special trip to Arlington just to piss on his grave.
pazzyanne
(6,543 posts)"Not my president"!!!!!
ailsagirl
(22,885 posts)The very thought is a desecration!!!
Ananda62
(257 posts)Im a disabled vet and it would piss me off if nonveterans get to be buried at Arlington Natl Cemetery. Why would anyone think that is a good idea?
pazzyanne
(6,543 posts)tRump.
wnylib
(21,335 posts)Trump being buried at Arlington, I still don't believe that non veteran presidents should be buried there. The only possible argument for it is that they are Commanders-in-Chief, but that is also an argument against the idea.
The president is CIC precisely because he/she is a civilian. The constitution intentionally gives civilian cpntrol over the military. Even presidents who once setved are civilians when they are in office.
Burying non veteran presidents at Arlington would blur the distinction between the military and the civilian control of it.
Arlington is an honor for those who served. We should not diminish that honor in any way.
(And I don't believe that Trump didn't have at least a behind-the-scenes connection with this proposal.)
dchill
(38,441 posts)keithbvadu2
(36,654 posts)The Trumps are not shy about proclaiming how much they have 'sacrificed'.
Visit to Arlington Cemetery reminded Donald Trump Jr. of all his family's 'sacrifices,' he writes
https://www.stripes.com/news/us/visit-to-arlington-cemetery-reminded-donald-trump-jr-of-all-his-family-s-sacrifices-he-writes-1.606501
cstanleytech
(26,227 posts)Gore1FL
(21,098 posts)EndlessWire
(6,455 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Except I was going to say only if we can do it right NOW!
RainCaster
(10,831 posts)Rudy found where/how he should be buried. There is no way that anyone who didn't serve should be buried at Arlington. Especially Cadet BoneSpurs.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)In a fox hole with wounded soldiers, a hostile tosses a grenade into the fox hole, and Trump fights through the pain of his bone spurs and throws his body over it to save the soldiers. It explodes and kills him.
I would accept that deed as a ticket to Arlington. But, he has less than 2 months to perform the act.
keithbvadu2
(36,654 posts)Donald would grab the nearest non-relative sycophant and 'volunteer' him on top of the grenade.
Medal to follow - for Donald.
Brainfodder
(6,423 posts)SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)usajumpedtheshark
(672 posts)hlthe2b
(102,119 posts)permanent battle zone for those offended by Trump's rotting body presence. This is insane.
No. If they didn't serve, they should be buried there.
Buns_of_Fire
(17,151 posts)take advantage of it within the next few days.
Other than that, no.
Besides, I thought he was scheduled to be planted on one of his properties (whichever one hasn't been foreclosed on when Satan calls him home).
EndlessWire
(6,455 posts)Bone Spurs doesn't get to be buried among Heroes.
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)dansolo
(5,376 posts)VP is nowhere in the chain of command. It is all bullshit trying to suck up to Trump to bestow another unearned honor upon him by sycophantic cowards.
JI7
(89,239 posts)dsc
(52,152 posts)have Bill Clinton leak that he is considering being buried at Arlington if the rule is changed, I guarantee you that Duckworth's bill banning such a change would pass in a nanosecond.
Turin_C3PO
(13,909 posts)Imagine the conservative freak out.
Paladin
(28,243 posts)But no, Arlington should be reserved for the military.