Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I missed this lunacy from Jenna Ellis (Original Post) pat_k Nov 2020 OP
Any day now struggle4progress Nov 2020 #1
Wonderful! pat_k Nov 2020 #5
I'm guessing this is largely about the benjamins at this point... Princess Turandot Nov 2020 #2
Makes sense. pat_k Nov 2020 #4
In two weeks. It's always in two weeks... captain queeg Nov 2020 #3
Four years ago peggysue2 Nov 2020 #6
Just another example of the rampant unscrupulous perfidy pat_k Nov 2020 #7

Princess Turandot

(4,787 posts)
2. I'm guessing this is largely about the benjamins at this point...
Sun Nov 22, 2020, 04:43 AM
Nov 2020

Apparently, their latest fundraising messages indicate that the share of donations going Trump related PACs is now 75%! You can't fund raise for challenges if you're not doing them.

It should also be noted that SCOTUS has had a suit related to PA's late-arriving mail ballots in their in-box for nearly two weeks and has done ugatz with it. (These are the several hundred ballots that were set aside and not included in the tallies.) They've yet to even put it on the schedule for their weekly discussion conference.

Not to mention, the federal appellate courts as well as SCOTUS do not generally hear cases that are presenting evidence for the first time. You know, the evidence that Trump was holding back at the circuit court level, where it's supposed to be presented!

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
4. Makes sense.
Sun Nov 22, 2020, 03:27 PM
Nov 2020

They have to pretend filing without evidence is somehow effective as long as you promise "We'll have evidence, just wait!"

Sure, there are cases where discovery is necessary, but you need to provide evidence to support the notion that there is some "there, there" that you are looking for. They aren't doing anything like that. Just claiming they "know" there was massive fraud, and just haven't actually gathered the evidence of it yet. The only thing close to a request for discovery is asking to count the ballots themselves, with absolutely no justification for what they would "learn" that is not already known or discoverable based on the normal processes.

captain queeg

(10,170 posts)
3. In two weeks. It's always in two weeks...
Sun Nov 22, 2020, 06:12 AM
Nov 2020

You’d think that would be getting old even in the trumposphere. Certainly not going to fly in court.

peggysue2

(10,828 posts)
6. Four years ago
Sun Nov 22, 2020, 03:42 PM
Nov 2020

Jenna Ellis called Trump a dirtbag. Amazing what money can do to twist your head and ethics 180 degrees.

Disgusting!

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
7. Just another example of the rampant unscrupulous perfidy
Sun Nov 22, 2020, 07:04 PM
Nov 2020

We say we are a government of laws, but the truth is we are a government of people. When our government is overrun with people who don't have a modicum of decency, we are in deep shit.

Biden has a monumental job ahead.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I missed this lunacy from...