General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMichigan Is Not Proceeding On Certification Yet
There is a delay in moving forward as the repubs will not certify.
mobeau69
(11,132 posts)Tom Rinaldo
(22,911 posts)That is what I heard anyway. His "objection" I think was that he didn't want a motion to certify to be introduced prior to th public being able to make their comments, out of "respect" or something.
sfstaxprep
(9,998 posts)We'll see. But the mere fact he raised an objection is a sign to me that something is up.
Who gives a damn about the stupid comments. Joe Biden won by 150K+, certify the damn thing. I doubt this is happening in other states.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)sfstaxprep
(9,998 posts)When did I say I'm Hoping they don't certify.
One of the 2 repubs already said they intend to vote no. That leaves 1.
I think it's very possible they don't certify. But in no way am I hoping they don't certify.
I think the Covid-19 outbreak is going to get much worse in the coming weeks. I don't hope it, but I think it's a very likely reality.
We shall see, but if you're counting on the 1 remaining repub to certify, I think you're a little too optimistic at this point.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)That is just not true.
In fact, listening to the one Republican, he's clearly pushing the idea they're legally required to certify. But the fact you decided to push a claim that they were not going to certify, despite no actual vote yet, is either you hoping that's what they'll do for whatever reason or you're being disingenuous to what is actually happening.
sfstaxprep
(9,998 posts)It Says "Won't Certify Yet"
It doesn't say "Won't Certify"
As of this very moment, they have "Not Certified Yet," so I don't see how that means I hope they don't certify, or I'm pushing the idea they're not going to at all.
So I suppose if on November 3rd, I said that Joe Biden has not won yet, it meant I hoped he wouldn't, or thought he wouldn't.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Is that projection or hope on your end? Just weird that your interpretation of one Republican wanting to let people speak, after clearly stating he thinks they have a constitutional duty to certify, is to state they will not certify.
I think clearly the one Republican is leaning toward certification, while the other is probably agaisnt it. Yet your post indicates differently.
Is it possible both refuse to certify? Sure. But I doubt it.
zanana1
(6,102 posts)TeamPooka
(24,205 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)But I'm not going to chill. I'm tired of fear porn here at DU. There was nothing stated at any point during this meeting so far to indicate, as the OP claims, they won't certify.
TeamPooka
(24,205 posts)as that is what the GOP members of the board are doing right now.
Delaying and setting up a case to vote no, in real time.
It is not fear porn to actively oversee the corruption happening live on the internet
Trump is doing everything he can to disrupt this process and steal the election.
That's a fact, not fear porn.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)It's pretty clear they have the votes to certify. If you don't see that, it's because you're trying to convince yourself Trump is going to somehow do the improbable and steal this election. Well if you believe such silliness, keep it to yourself or don't misrepresent what is happening to justify your own crazy fear.
The OP is wrong and so are you. It's pretty clear by what the other Republican is saying on the committee that he'll vote to certify.
SlogginThroughIt
(1,977 posts)That was uncalled for and you did it to me last night.
Stop putting words in peoples mouths
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Especially when it's unsubstantiated and unjustified. It's annoying as all hell to see posters push bullshit to spread fear. Especially when it's baseless. Just as you did yesterday. If you don't like this level of response, stop clutching your pearls over mundane shit.
SlogginThroughIt
(1,977 posts)Again why so confrontational.
There is no fear porn there is discussion. If you cannot handle that without getting confrontational then trash the thread, scroll on by, or take a break.
YOUR behavior is not ok.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)I'm tired of you people pushing your fear porn. It's that simple. When you purposely twist points to support your fear porn, I'm going to bitch. That is not okay. There's a subset of this forum who has to go out of their way to tell us Trump is going to steal this election and they remind us of this every day. It's annoying. It's not substantiated. It's not helpful. It's not discussion. It's fear porn.
Some people are miserable and can't help but make others miserable with them, hence pushing half-truths to support the narrative that the SC will install Trump.
I said it yesterday and I'll say it again today: both the far-right and far-left have convinced themselves Trump will still prevail. It's clear delusions are not isolated to just one ideology.
arlyellowdog
(866 posts)Girard442
(6,065 posts)...will keep the RW crazies off his lawn.
Mike 03
(16,616 posts)AnnaLee
(1,033 posts)It seemed to be just a bunch of delay stupid to me. I'll wait for the breaking news.
MineralMan
(146,254 posts)It sounds to me, though, like the one Republican will vote to certify, based on what he said when asking that public comment be allowed.
Johnny2X2X
(18,969 posts)And kind of what was expected. It should be a 3-1 vote to certify.
MineralMan
(146,254 posts)Now, they said that over 800 people asked to speak to the board. I cannot imagine that they are going to allow that many to speak, or we would be here a week from now. So, at some point, someone is going to move to end the discussion and call the question.
If I were on that board, I would do that after a couple or three public officials had spoken. I would expect that three people on the board, at least, would vote to end the discussion and call the question. Then the chair would call for a roll call voted. Three people would vote to certify and that would be the end of the meeting.
This will not be allowed to go on endlessly, taking comments from extremely biased individuals who would turn this into a shouting match. The board has a duty to vote to certify. That vote should be taken. If there a tie, perhaps further discussion should take place and the laws read to the board again, as they have already been. There should be no adjournment until the vote is to certify.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)The Republicans haven't refused to certify. They're taking public comments now.
joshcryer
(62,265 posts)What a joke.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)That's a problem.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,307 posts)bluecollar2
(3,622 posts)Ms. Toad
(33,992 posts)bluecollar2
(3,622 posts)MineralMan
(146,254 posts)There is no need to go to a Fox TV feed. No need at all. YouTube has plenty of bandwidth available.
Ms. Toad
(33,992 posts)There is a motion to certify on the floor.
They are in the discussion phase.
After the discussion on the motion - then - comes the vote.
Whether they will delay is up in the air (but unlikely) based on Langevelde's comments (the other R) so far.
Girard442
(6,065 posts)The just want to whine about it first.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)pat_k
(9,313 posts)As Nevilledog posts here, they don't have discretion on this.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=14602105
Writ of Mandamus is the remedy
168.878 Construction of sections; action against board of state canvassers by mandamus.
Given the laws mandating action (Nevilledog's OP), a petition for writ of mandamus would certainly be granted.Mandamus
Overview
A (writ of) mandamus is an order from a court to an inferior government official ordering the government official to properly fulfill their official duties or correct an abuse of discretion.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)I've seen the GOP member who is also a lawyer recognize that he has no choice but certify.
helpisontheway
(5,004 posts)the ability to replace the members if they will not do their job. Wonder how long all of that would take. I wish all of the Republicans that are causing issues in MI and PA would go straight to hell. 🤬
sfstaxprep
(9,998 posts)I am sincerely hoping for this to be over in short order. The last thing I want is a Shit Show. I just don't like pinning all my hopes on a single repub member, so I will wait for the 3rd out in the 9th inning before counting any chickens.
LexVegas
(6,028 posts)zanana1
(6,102 posts)For what purpose, I don't know.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)In the middle of a pandemic, economic collapse, educational shutdown and half a dozen other crises, these clowns are still playing butthurt games.
sfstaxprep
(9,998 posts)Now they're talking about all the people who worked long hours to get to this point, and that they are minimizing their efforts by questioning this and delaying the certification one minute longer.
Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)...people like hearing their own voice.
sfstaxprep
(9,998 posts)I think they're up to about 7 speakers so far.
Not one of them has wavered in their statements that the vote must be certified, and it is mandatory.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)I am not sure that last lady wasn't a Trumper
MoonlitKnight
(1,584 posts)The speakers should state, the law requires you to certify today and hang up.
Or they should just say they no longer wish to comment.
sfstaxprep
(9,998 posts)tavernier
(12,368 posts)while knowing full well that the longer this drags on, the longer it will take for the new administration to organize the preliminary pandemic vaccine administration process, and that people will literally lose their lives from the wasted minutes and seconds.
sfstaxprep
(9,998 posts)We voted the Shitstain and his Merry Band Of Misfits out.
All we can do is wait now, and Thank God the end is near.
We can't control him for the next 2 months, any more than we could for the last 46 Months.
Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)The board should get on with the business at hand.
sfstaxprep
(9,998 posts)Doesn't sound like anything more than that. The Democratic board member is the one who requested it.
sfstaxprep
(9,998 posts)She's Michigan repub party Chairperson I believe.
sfstaxprep
(9,998 posts)He does sound like he's convinced they have a legal obligation to certify at this point.