Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVan Langevelde is tearing that John James attorney apart with the law.
Hes going to vote to certify.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 1628 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (17)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Van Langevelde is tearing that John James attorney apart with the law. (Original Post)
roamer65
Nov 2020
OP
Van Langevelde? The one who either truly did not know RROO or pretended in bad faith to not
WhiskeyGrinder
Nov 2020
#2
catbyte
(34,383 posts)1. It's encouraging for certification because he's the other republican.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,337 posts)2. Van Langevelde? The one who either truly did not know RROO or pretended in bad faith to not
know just to throw the chair off?
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)9. WTF?
is an RROO
obamanut2012
(26,071 posts)10. Robert's Rules of Order
Johnny2X2X
(19,066 posts)3. This is a formality
That it will be 3-1 is a joke. The 1 completely overstepped his bounds and should be removed.
brush
(53,776 posts)6. Yes, he should be removed as that board has no authority to...
rule on whether to certify or not. Their only option is validate what the counties have reported. Once the certification is done then the audits can commence.
I wonder if he's on of the ones who flew to DC and got wined and dines by trump in his hotel?
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)4. Yeah, it's going to be 3-1 with Norman Shinkle voting no.
wryter2000
(46,044 posts)5. Is the vote going to be today?
I just want this over.
drray23
(7,627 posts)7. I hope the michigan AG sues anybody on that board who votes against.
They are legally required to do so after the counties have all certified. Their job is not to assess whether an election was correct, its just to affirm that all counties have returned the certifications.
kansasobama
(609 posts)8. Norman Shinkle cannot vote NO
Whether it is 3-1 or not, he should be taken to task.