Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

onethatcares

(16,165 posts) Tue Nov 24, 2020, 08:22 AM Nov 2020

is there any recourse to the USSC

at this point?

Or is that moot?

asking because I read some magats rant about that happening.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

is there any recourse to the USSC (Original Post) onethatcares Nov 2020 OP

what are you asking as its not clear to me at all beachbumbob Nov 2020 #1

on a much different site onethatcares Nov 2020 #2

Supreme Court will not be involved as its the state's jurisdiction on elections and only standing beachbumbob Nov 2020 #3

beachbumbob

(9,263 posts)

1. what are you asking as its not clear to me at all

Reply to onethatcares (Original post)

Tue Nov 24, 2020, 09:01 AM

Nov 2020

onethatcares

(16,165 posts)

2. on a much different site

Reply to beachbumbob (Reply #1)

Tue Nov 24, 2020, 09:06 AM

Nov 2020

one of the magats said "it's not over til the fat lady sings and the supreme court is the fat lady"

I'm trying to line up my argument that the court will not entertain any suit and Joe Biden is the president without their interference.

As a nail banging carpenter sometimes it's difficult for me to do that. thanks.

beachbumbob

(9,263 posts)

3. Supreme Court will not be involved as its the state's jurisdiction on elections and only standing

Reply to onethatcares (Reply #2)

Tue Nov 24, 2020, 09:13 AM

Nov 2020

would need to be based on some type of discrimination aspect. Why the trump campaign is 1-35 in losing so far. CLAIMING an issue WITHOUT ANY credible evidence is simply laughed out of court as we have seen, by REPUBLICAN judges. This will never get before the SC

Reply to this discussion