Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Quixote1818

(28,919 posts)
Wed Nov 25, 2020, 09:11 PM Nov 2020

Covid cases should be most commonly displayed as "Cases per 1 million pop".

This is a better indication of how a state is handling things with both NORTH and SOUTH DAKOTA doing the WORST! I know South Dakota hasn't done hardly anything to slow the spread. No mask mandate, no closing of businesses etc.

California is actually in 41st place when ranked based on population. You can click on that tab that says "Cases per 1 million pop", to get it to display the states this way.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Covid cases should be most commonly displayed as "Cases per 1 million pop". (Original Post) Quixote1818 Nov 2020 OP
I'd like to see both figures. Karadeniz Nov 2020 #1
Why cases/million? hardluck Nov 2020 #2
I think the main point is to use per capita figures, instead of raw numbers... Silent3 Nov 2020 #4
I tend to think deaths per million is a much better PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 2020 #3
I would agree but the NE US got hammered early before they knew how to handle this Quixote1818 Nov 2020 #5
Those early deaths are what happens when your HC systems are Maru Kitteh Nov 2020 #8
It should've been that way for international comparison too rictofen Nov 2020 #6
Even better would be cases per million population over the last 7 days Klaralven Nov 2020 #7

hardluck

(637 posts)
2. Why cases/million?
Wed Nov 25, 2020, 10:50 PM
Nov 2020

Why not deaths/million or hospitalizations/million or % of hospital beds available? I'm not sure cases is the most important factor.

Silent3

(15,151 posts)
4. I think the main point is to use per capita figures, instead of raw numbers...
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 12:27 AM
Nov 2020

...regardless of whether you're talking about cases, deaths, or hospitalizations. Comparisons between states, and between countries, are much more meaningful that way.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,816 posts)
3. I tend to think deaths per million is a much better
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 12:20 AM
Nov 2020

metric.

Using that, Belgium is by far the worst country. Oddly enough, no one ever talks about it. I wonder why.

Quixote1818

(28,919 posts)
5. I would agree but the NE US got hammered early before they knew how to handle this
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 03:08 AM
Nov 2020

So NY, MA, NJ, CT etc. have the highest number of deaths per million and almost all of them came in March and April.

Maru Kitteh

(28,323 posts)
8. Those early deaths are what happens when your HC systems are
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 09:28 AM
Nov 2020

completely overwhelmed. It’s why we will have 320K deaths by Dec 19. Because it’s coming soon again - only this time it’s everywhere.

rictofen

(236 posts)
6. It should've been that way for international comparison too
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 04:32 AM
Nov 2020

I suspect most people know that, but it's more fun (and politically expedient) to talk about the US being "number one!"

 

Klaralven

(7,510 posts)
7. Even better would be cases per million population over the last 7 days
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 08:56 AM
Nov 2020

Using the 7-day moving average washes out the "weekend effect" of less reporting on the weekend and a corresponding bump in cases at the beginning of the week as the data comes in.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Covid cases should be mos...