Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In a statement, COVID-19 thanked the Supreme Court (Original Post) bigtree Nov 2020 OP
So does this mean non secular places have the same ability to fill up as religious ones? Seems like uponit7771 Nov 2020 #1
exactly bigtree Nov 2020 #5
The RWer judges just made to worst for us . .. Iliyah Nov 2020 #2
right, they're ruling remotely bigtree Nov 2020 #6
With a special shout-out Cirque du So-What Nov 2020 #3
THIS! THIS! THIS! Is EXACTLY why we need to expand the SCOTUS! One for each circuit Ninga Nov 2020 #4
Actually, both are at 9...9 SC Justices, 9 Circuit Courts. Wounded Bear Nov 2020 #22
I found this: Ninga Nov 2020 #27
We knew Amy North Shore Chicago Nov 2020 #7
Opus Dei rules the court.... magicarpet Nov 2020 #8
My religious group would never ask for such a special privilege Martin Eden Nov 2020 #9
I'd love to see the Church of the FSM get a case before the Supreme Court over this Shermann Nov 2020 #14
Our religious faith is more private and spiritual Martin Eden Nov 2020 #17
Stealing that. n/t rzemanfl Nov 2020 #24
The restrictions don't specifically single out religious gatherings so kacekwl Nov 2020 #10
+1, I've not heard why they say the edict come down harder on religious groups vs any other ... uponit7771 Nov 2020 #13
Praise death and disease underpants Nov 2020 #11
We will revisit this when we get a legally Baitball Blogger Nov 2020 #12
Just heard on MSNBC the reasoning for justices was there was no evidence that the houses of worship uponit7771 Nov 2020 #15
The default position is that any large gatherings without distancing will contribute to spread Shermann Nov 2020 #18
What? NJCher Nov 2020 #19
Thank you Delphinus Nov 2020 #30
What about that church choir in Washington State that led to most of them getting infected? TheBlackAdder Nov 2020 #21
+1, not only this I don't believe NY attorneys were that unprepared to give hard evidence on why uponit7771 Nov 2020 #25
I would think the "Golden Rule" people would be happy to follow their own rules randr Nov 2020 #16
Ha ha, you're funny! Wounded Bear Nov 2020 #23
undertaker lobby thanked supreme court beachbumbob Nov 2020 #20
We're WAY Overdue for a Major Darwinism Episode The Roux Comes First Nov 2020 #26
Guy on MSNBC jsut said the same thing about the supreme court saying there was no evidence church or uponit7771 Nov 2020 #28
Kick dalton99a Nov 2020 #29
K&R. nt Wednesdays Nov 2020 #31
Beware the God Squad, my son...... n/t DFW Nov 2020 #32

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
1. So does this mean non secular places have the same ability to fill up as religious ones? Seems like
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 10:38 AM
Nov 2020

... if restrictions were being applied evenly religious affiliations wouldn't come into play

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
2. The RWer judges just made to worst for us . ..
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 10:38 AM
Nov 2020

regarding COVID-19 while they judge from a bubble of security.

Cirque du So-What

(25,932 posts)
3. With a special shout-out
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 10:40 AM
Nov 2020

to evangelical megachurches whose congregations insist they are immune due to coverage by the blood. The entire COVID-19 community had a good laugh over that and collectively says, ‘bless your heart. We’ll do the rest.’

Ninga

(8,275 posts)
4. THIS! THIS! THIS! Is EXACTLY why we need to expand the SCOTUS! One for each circuit
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 10:42 AM
Nov 2020

court.

President Biden needs to see this ruling as foreshadowing, not for good.

Ninga

(8,275 posts)
27. I found this:
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 12:02 PM
Nov 2020

13
There are 94 district courts, 13 circuit courts, and one Supreme Court throughout the country. Courts in the federal system work differently in many ways than state courts.

Introduction To The Federal Court System | USAO ...

Martin Eden

(12,864 posts)
9. My religious group would never ask for such a special privilege
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 10:50 AM
Nov 2020

The Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster has more respect than that for societal norms and for the health of its faithful members.

Ramen, Pastafarians.

Shermann

(7,413 posts)
14. I'd love to see the Church of the FSM get a case before the Supreme Court over this
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 11:01 AM
Nov 2020

Where have they been of late?

Martin Eden

(12,864 posts)
17. Our religious faith is more private and spiritual
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 11:07 AM
Nov 2020

We tend not to shove it in other people's face.

Religion is like a penis: it's fine to have one, it's fine to be proud of it, but please don't whip it out and start waving it around in public, and please don't try to shove it down my children's throats

kacekwl

(7,016 posts)
10. The restrictions don't specifically single out religious gatherings so
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 10:53 AM
Nov 2020

why would any court look sideways at their complaint ? These religious freedom crybabies should be impeached from the bench. I hate religious Nazis.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
13. +1, I've not heard why they say the edict come down harder on religious groups vs any other ...
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 11:01 AM
Nov 2020

... non secular groups etc.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
15. Just heard on MSNBC the reasoning for justices was there was no evidence that the houses of worship
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 11:04 AM
Nov 2020

... lead to spread of CV19

Jus damn

Shermann

(7,413 posts)
18. The default position is that any large gatherings without distancing will contribute to spread
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 11:12 AM
Nov 2020

The science is pretty clear on that and there is no need to specifically study church buildings.

This is just a shifting of the burden of proof.

I don't have a Juris Doctor degree, but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
25. +1, not only this I don't believe NY attorneys were that unprepared to give hard evidence on why
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 11:47 AM
Nov 2020

... the need to keep large gatherings at a minimum no matter what the setting.

There's more to this ruling than meets the eye imho

The Roux Comes First

(1,299 posts)
26. We're WAY Overdue for a Major Darwinism Episode
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 11:57 AM
Nov 2020

Time to do some serious high-grading of our deoxyribonucleic acid! And here it comes, right on time. Volunteers in all their maga glory cannot wait to crowd inside and share aerosols.

https://darwinawards.com/

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
28. Guy on MSNBC jsut said the same thing about the supreme court saying there was no evidence church or
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 12:04 PM
Nov 2020

... religious meetings spread the virus.

I'm hearing the guy right, there's something really wrong with the USSC ruling

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In a statement, COVID-19 ...