Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,922 posts)
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 01:56 PM Nov 2020

Flournoy gets progressive boost in Biden's search for Pentagon chief

Michèle Flournoy, a top contender to be President-elect Joe Biden's secretary of defense, got a round of public endorsements on Wednesday from progressive-minded lawmakers and disarmament advocates as the veteran national security official faces headwinds from others on the left who are critical of her past views and ties to defense contractors.

"We are keenly aware of the critical need for a leader with Flournoy’s expertise on complex national security issues," Reps. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) and Jackie Speier (D-Calif.), two subcommitteee chairs on the House Armed Services Committee, said in a joint statement. "Ms. Flournoy’s sound policy experience will be vital to ensuring strong civilian oversight of the military, professionalism and ethics in our special operations forces, workforce diversity, and activities to strengthen our technological edge through science and innovation."

Another progressive member of the panel, Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.), an Iraq War veteran, also tweeted that "Michèle Flournoy has a deep understanding of the existing DOD bureaucracy and the future of our defense. That’s a rare combination.

"I would love to see her nominated for Secretary of Defense," he added.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/flournoy-gets-progressive-boost-in-bidens-search-for-pentagon-chief/ar-BB1bmS3E?li=BBnb7Kz

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Flournoy gets progressive boost in Biden's search for Pentagon chief (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2020 OP
By whose definition are these progressives? vsrazdem Nov 2020 #1
They don't pass your purity test? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2020 #2
Their records. The first two are proven solid progressives. Moulton is more Blue_true Nov 2020 #4
I don't have a purity test. I am asking what definition they are using as vsrazdem Nov 2020 #3
What definition do you use? BainsBane Nov 2020 #5
I would expect them to be members of the progressive caucus if vsrazdem Nov 2020 #6
Some Believe You Can't Be Seen as Progressive Unless You're Aligned with the Squad Indykatie Nov 2020 #7

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
4. Their records. The first two are proven solid progressives. Moulton is more
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 02:14 PM
Nov 2020

center-left, somewhat to the right of my more leftward stance. I view myself as a pragmatic-progressive, I believe in everything that a Senator Sanders or AOC believe in, but I need to see a realistic route for accomplishing those things and making them a permanent part of out culture.

vsrazdem

(2,177 posts)
6. I would expect them to be members of the progressive caucus if
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 02:18 PM
Nov 2020

they are considering themselves to be progressive, that would be my first guess.

Indykatie

(3,696 posts)
7. Some Believe You Can't Be Seen as Progressive Unless You're Aligned with the Squad
Thu Nov 26, 2020, 02:27 PM
Nov 2020

It's BS of course but the Media certainly sees it that way. Hence everyone knows who AOC is but few know who Lauren Underwood. Underwood had a productive freshman year in the House but that doesn't give the Media the drama and conflict they crave.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Flournoy gets progressive...