Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court weighs child-slavery case against Nestle USA, Cargill
Oral arguments are coming up. C-Span says you can watch, but, no, you can't.
WATCH LIVE ON DECEMBER 01 | 10AM ET | C-SPAN.ORG
Alien Tort Statute Consolidated Arguments
The U.S. Supreme Court hears the consolidated oral arguments in Nestle USA, Inc v. Doe I, Docket number 19-416 and Cargill, Inc v. Doe I, a consolidated case on U.S. corporations and liabilities for alleged child slave labor violations abroad.
Alien Tort Statute Consolidated Arguments
The U.S. Supreme Court hears the consolidated oral arguments in Nestle USA, Inc v. Doe I, Docket number 19-416 and Cargill, Inc v. Doe I, a consolidated case on U.S. corporations and liabilities for alleged child slave labor violations abroad.
Supreme Court weighs child-slavery case against Nestlé USA, Cargill
Link to tweet
Case preview: When can U.S. companies be sued for alleged violations of international human rights?
By Amy Howe on Nov 30, 2020 at 10:21 am
Enacted as part of the Judiciary Act of 1789, the Alien Tort Statute allows foreigners to bring lawsuits in U.S. courts for serious violations of international law. On Tuesday, the justices will hear oral argument in a pair of cases, Nestlé USA v. Doe I and Cargill, Inc. v. Doe I, that ask whether a lawsuit brought under the ATS by former child slaves in Ivory Coast can continue. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants, both U.S. companies, facilitated human-rights abuses on the plantations where the youths worked. The companies warn that allowing lawsuits like this one to go forward could be a drain on the U.S. economy and cause problems for U.S. foreign policy, while the plaintiffs counter that these are exactly the kinds of lawsuits that Congress intended to address with the ATS.
{snip}
By Amy Howe on Nov 30, 2020 at 10:21 am
Enacted as part of the Judiciary Act of 1789, the Alien Tort Statute allows foreigners to bring lawsuits in U.S. courts for serious violations of international law. On Tuesday, the justices will hear oral argument in a pair of cases, Nestlé USA v. Doe I and Cargill, Inc. v. Doe I, that ask whether a lawsuit brought under the ATS by former child slaves in Ivory Coast can continue. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants, both U.S. companies, facilitated human-rights abuses on the plantations where the youths worked. The companies warn that allowing lawsuits like this one to go forward could be a drain on the U.S. economy and cause problems for U.S. foreign policy, while the plaintiffs counter that these are exactly the kinds of lawsuits that Congress intended to address with the ATS.
{snip}
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 841 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court weighs child-slavery case against Nestle USA, Cargill (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Dec 2020
OP
malaise
(268,885 posts)1. Get thee to the greatest page
Very important
Trueblue Texan
(2,425 posts)2. I cannot believe one of the defenses is...
...that allowing this lawsuit to continue would be bad for the economy!!!! Basically they are arguing that opposing child slavery is bad for the economy!!!! MY HAIR IS ON FIRE!!!!!!!!!!
malaise
(268,885 posts)3. Atlantic slavery built capitalism
They are speaking THEIR truth. The question is what is ours?
mucifer
(23,522 posts)5. kinda sounds familiar...
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)4. Spoiler alert - 6 wing-nuts vote in favor of child slavery. Paging QAnon
to the white courtesy phone.