Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump About to Suffer One Last Foreign Policy Loss on His Way Out the Door
The signature foreign policy accomplishment of the Trump presidency, such as it is, is the Abraham Accords, which saw the normalization of relations between Israel and the UAE. Part of the deal (and some have gone so far as to call this a bribe) was that the administration agreed to sell 50 F-35 aircraft, a big stockpile of missiles, and 18 Reaper drones to UAE. The members of Congress, Democratic and Republican, are largely not thrilled to drop so much extra firepower into the middle of that region, especially since Israel would have to be given additional planes/arms, thus potentially triggering an arms race. So, it appears that the sale is going to be rejected. How Trump, or the UAE, will respond to this development is anyone's guess.
It is going to be very interesting to see how Trump's foreign policy will be judged, long term. There may be no aspect of the presidency that requires more diligent, painstaking work than conducting foreign policy. Trump does not do "diligent" or "painstaking," so he went for quick and easy scores, like the photo-ops with Kim Jong-Un, or the killing of Qasem Soleimani. The problem with quick and easy foreign policy is that it tends to be ephemeral, and has little long-term impact. Surely, Trump will leave office having done less of substance, foreign policy-wise, than any president since World War II. So, on a scale of 1 to 10, he might be a 1 or a 2, right? Except that while he didn't do much that was highly positive, he also didn't do much that was highly negative. He didn't effectively cook up a war in Vietnam (like LBJ) or one in Iraq (like Bush 43). He didn't illegally bomb Cambodia (like Nixon), or overthrow the legally elected leader of Iran (like Eisenhower). So, does the absence of big, red debits on his foreign policy résumé push Trump up to a 3 or 4 on that scale of 1 to 10? It is a good question. (Z)
###
https://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2020/Pres/Maps/Dec02.html#item-4
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1084 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump About to Suffer One Last Foreign Policy Loss on His Way Out the Door (Original Post)
DonViejo
Dec 2020
OP
Blue Owl
(50,506 posts)1. The Loathsome Loser's Last Lump
Yank him!
OregonBlue
(7,754 posts)2. Note that the "highly negatives" are all GOP presidents.