General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama was very wise not to follow our advice tonight
The only thing bringing up the 47% comment, tax returns, vouchercare, Bain, etc., at the first debate would have done is cause him to lose: Obama's a bully, why won't he defend his failed presidency, yada yada.
By standing back and letting Romney paint himself into a corner he did several things.
A. Got material for campaign commercials until the next time they meet.
B. Came off looking presidential.
C. Displayed his mastery of an old infantry tactic where you lure your enemy into what looks like a safe, easy route...after you surround it with platoons of machinegunners and cases of claymore mines.
Y'see, the media told him he won this debate and now he gets complacent.
Norrin Radd
(4,959 posts)Katstayton
(2 posts)I agree!
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Want to listen to Romney lying. I'm tired of not getting real ideas discussed, which Obama wanted to happen. Then I tune in here and read all the gloom and certainly didn't want to see it. Now we get the second and third considerations out here. There was no use giving Romney's lies any credit. So there was no use responding to the clanging gong.
skeewee08
(1,983 posts)Lisa D
(1,532 posts)that just gives Romney as chance to take the sting out of that video. No way was Obama going to let him weasel his way out of it.
And like you said, now Obama's got oodles of campaign material to show Romney for the blatant liar that he is.
BainsBane
(57,757 posts)but he still should have been more forceful in presenting his points.
CabCurious
(954 posts)He didn't speak in hyperbole or half-truths.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Letting Rmoney hang himself as he babbles on with his lies.
Indpndnt
(2,391 posts)Obama looked calm and presidential tonight. That's all that was needed. The commercials that come out of this comparing Willard's multiple stances on the same issues from one day to the next will be brutal.
JI7
(93,615 posts)bring up certain things.
the "zingers" he gave were moslty lame.
mrs_p
(3,236 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,568 posts)Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)And in his haste, left his flanks open to enfilade fire.
Troops are silently moving into position as we speak, while Mitt stands exposed, looking around, thinking that he has just taken the field of battle.
Except this was a only a skirmish.
The real battle hasn't even started yet, and Mitt doesn't even realize it.
He will soon.
skeewee08
(1,983 posts)Cha
(319,067 posts)over Big Bird's demise.
fishwax
(29,346 posts)They had those lines ready, and used them to explain a supposedly lackluster performance. But you know they had those lines at the ready, and were really hoping they could use them to explain a performance that they would describe as irritable or angry. Obama didn't give them the chance.
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)gordianot
(15,772 posts)So Mitt really does like Romney care and wants vouchers for Medicare. I am glad to know he will not lower taxes on the very wealthy.
mstinamotorcity2
(1,451 posts)Which Mitt Romney is that??
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)I agree, obama didn't listen to our "advice," and well he shouldn't; he did just fine with hte format he had.
wiredshut
(31 posts)No kidding! Moderated by who? Oh, was it that guy who was throwing out topics and doing his timer impression by going "umm"? Jim Lehrer was awful.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)See the thing is, the candidates are supposed to respect the moderator. The boundaries are set, and when the guy pipes up, fine, squeeze the last few words in, but respect that. In a situation like this, the moderator really can't try to shout over either candidate, or tell them to shut up, or whatever. it's rude, and bad form on his part.
The onus falls on the debaters to respect the forum and format. President Obama did. Romney most clearly did not.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Usually rope-a-dope requires a counterattack at some point. Getting mauled for 90 minutes isn't an effective campaign strategy.
speedoo
(11,229 posts)Romney dominated, but he did that with lies. Lies that will end up being very costly.
And Obama was able to get some shots in, but his shots were based on truth.
The counterattack is coming, and it will begin very soon.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)against outright lies?
As Newt Gingrich so succinctly stated, "How do you debate someone who will lie about everything?"
nyquil_man
(1,443 posts)Even if Romney had been left a crying heap on the floor, the instant response was going to be favorable to him.
It's a narrative. The guy who's leading holding on to his lead is not sexy. The underdog getting a few good nips in is, though. Now the narrative shifts again. The expectations for Romney click up a little higher.
Mitt's gotta jump even higher next time.
Raine
(31,177 posts)first debate, no matter what.
blogslut
(39,167 posts)We decided to take a drink every time Romney lied. Then we switched to drinking every time Romney lied outrageously. Then, drink every time Romney acted like a complete asshole. And then...well, we had to stop the drinking game because we wanted to remain conscious.
politicasista
(14,128 posts)Last edited Thu Oct 4, 2012, 03:24 AM - Edit history (1)
Hope Obama knows that his own debate coach is getting hated on by his own supporters. Kerry can't catch a break with no one, but thankfully, Obama shows ten times more respect and appreciation for the Senator than people ever will.
https://twitter.com/MMFlint/status/253682688177893377
The Doctor.
(17,266 posts)Unless we're talking about a different Kerry (like Bob), that is.
Response to The Doctor. (Reply #37)
politicasista This message was self-deleted by its author.
Raine
(31,177 posts)there was no point in getting down into a slugfest and being called an angry black man and a bully. Obama was Presidential exactly the way he should've been.
MrScorpio
(73,772 posts)The debate was the beginning, not the end.
Maximumnegro
(1,134 posts)are going to suddenly become tossups w/ 4 weeks to go all because of this debate is beyond me. I honestly taken aback at the Dem freak-out. You'd think after these 4 years it would be clear how BO works. Who really thinks he would just tank a debate with two of the most impressive election campaigns in recent memory under his belt, if he didn't have a game plan...
treestar
(82,383 posts)discussing that, and giving the details of what is really true. Had they been prepared, they'd already have clips of Rmoney saying the opposite of what he said tonight.
Some people seem more loyal to the pundits than to any candidate. These entertainers get lavish praise and I think they are more important to a lot of people than any candidate. They refuse to disagree with Rachel but will disagree with Democratic candidates.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)The Doctor.
(17,266 posts)'Send out a small force with a retreat plan. See what the enemies have and how they come after the squad.'
It's a martialist's standard tactic: Let them come at you with everything they have. If it doesn't drop you, then you've learned their weakness.
former-republican
(2,163 posts)to make us feel better.
This was not some master plan. President Obama was unprepared and his coach should be replaced before the next debate.