Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

greiner3

(5,214 posts)
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 07:31 AM Oct 2012

"Ohio high court: Police get leeway to question juveniles."

"However, a divided Ohio Supreme Court ruled yesterday that juvenile criminal suspects are not entitled under state law to be represented by an attorney while being interrogated by officers."

"Justice Terrence O’Donnell, who wrote the court’s 4-3 opinion, emphasized that while criminal defendants have a federal constitutional right to legal counsel, state law does not separately grant that right to juveniles."

Of course this will be appealed to SCOTUS.

Do you think this will be a chance the Robert's Court will have to strike down that 'nasty and pesky' Miranda decision?

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Ohio high court: Police get leeway to question juveniles." (Original Post) greiner3 Oct 2012 OP
And I believe pipoman Oct 2012 #1
 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
1. And I believe
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 07:46 AM
Oct 2012

juveniles should be required to be represented by an attorney or a parent before the police can ask them a single question...talk about an open door for abuse, coercion, and duress.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Ohio high court: Po...