General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI have changed my mind about a belief I have had for years.
I used to think that no judge should be appointed for a life long term.
Recent court decisions regarding the election have shown me that if a judge is appointed for life, there is no incentive for them to do any favors for the politician who appointed them.
Zoonart
(14,631 posts)Ms. Toad
(38,824 posts)Over time, judges appointed for life are freer to reject the death penalty (you don't have to kill people to prove you are tough on crime), to agree with the person responsible for your income at the end of your term, etc. They tend to move left, rather than right.
old guy
(3,299 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(131,242 posts)stillcool
(34,407 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(131,242 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(21,289 posts)He's more concerned about his legacy than any perceived duty to a political party.
Nictuku
(4,682 posts)THE MOST IMPORTANT issue for Article III Judges is to maintain the Independence of the Judiciary.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.