Fri Dec 11, 2020, 10:31 AM
Proud liberal 80 (4,164 posts)
This message was self-deleted by its authorThis message was self-deleted by its author (Proud liberal 80) on Sat Dec 12, 2020, 01:30 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
|
38 replies, 1456 views
Cannot reply in locked threads
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Proud liberal 80 | Dec 2020 | OP |
lapfog_1 | Dec 2020 | #1 | |
Cuthbert Allgood | Dec 2020 | #14 | |
cire41 | Dec 2020 | #20 | |
jcgoldie | Dec 2020 | #2 | |
Kingofalldems | Dec 2020 | #3 | |
obamanut2012 | Dec 2020 | #7 | |
dware | Dec 2020 | #11 | |
VMA131Marine | Dec 2020 | #4 | |
greenjar_01 | Dec 2020 | #5 | |
Thekaspervote | Dec 2020 | #6 | |
dware | Dec 2020 | #13 | |
obamanut2012 | Dec 2020 | #8 | |
dware | Dec 2020 | #9 | |
mr_lebowski | Dec 2020 | #10 | |
dware | Dec 2020 | #12 | |
mr_lebowski | Dec 2020 | #15 | |
dware | Dec 2020 | #16 | |
obamanut2012 | Dec 2020 | #17 | |
dware | Dec 2020 | #18 | |
mr_lebowski | Dec 2020 | #27 | |
dware | Dec 2020 | #28 | |
mr_lebowski | Dec 2020 | #29 | |
dware | Dec 2020 | #32 | |
Amishman | Dec 2020 | #19 | |
Codeine | Dec 2020 | #21 | |
Proud liberal 80 | Dec 2020 | #22 | |
Codeine | Dec 2020 | #24 | |
Proud liberal 80 | Dec 2020 | #25 | |
dware | Dec 2020 | #26 | |
Mike 03 | Dec 2020 | #23 | |
unblock | Dec 2020 | #33 | |
unblock | Dec 2020 | #30 | |
Saboburns | Dec 2020 | #31 | |
LanternWaste | Dec 2020 | #34 | |
Kingofalldems | Dec 2020 | #35 | |
Codeine | Dec 2020 | #36 | |
Sam1 | Dec 2020 | #37 | |
Sam1 | Dec 2020 | #38 |
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Original post)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 10:54 AM
lapfog_1 (27,884 posts)
1. if scotus agrees to hear the case
better than 50/50 that we are screwed
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to lapfog_1 (Reply #1)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:19 AM
Cuthbert Allgood (4,468 posts)
14. No way Roberts wants this case.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Cuthbert Allgood (Reply #14)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:32 AM
cire41 (34 posts)
20. Or the federalist Gorsuch n/t
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Original post)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 10:57 AM
jcgoldie (10,518 posts)
2. Lol
50/50 chance
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Original post)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 10:58 AM
Kingofalldems (37,189 posts)
3. Early today I see.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Kingofalldems (Reply #3)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:06 AM
obamanut2012 (24,206 posts)
7. do a search
was even earlier.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to obamanut2012 (Reply #7)
dware This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Original post)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:00 AM
VMA131Marine (3,853 posts)
4. SCOTUS has no business agreeing to hear the TX case
But if they agree to hear it then all bets are off on what they will do. That would be a sign that the fix is in and the 5 partisans on the court are going to rule in Trump’s favour no matter what the evidence shows. I don’t expect that because it would be seen as a blatantly partisan decision.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Original post)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:03 AM
greenjar_01 (6,477 posts)
5. Jaysus Mary and Joseph give it a fucking rest already
Fuckin' 'ell.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Original post)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:06 AM
Thekaspervote (29,639 posts)
6. Oh please..how many times are you going to post this same concern?
Schooled constitutional and SCOTUS experts have weighed in..so please
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Thekaspervote (Reply #6)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:17 AM
dware (9,685 posts)
13. Kinda makes you wonder, doesn't it. nt
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Original post)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:07 AM
obamanut2012 (24,206 posts)
8. lolz
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Original post)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:07 AM
dware (9,685 posts)
9. And another one.
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Original post)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:13 AM
mr_lebowski (31,930 posts)
10. Personally think a lot of the posters on this thread are whistling past the proverbial graveyard
I don't know if I'd say 50/50 but the odds of Trump's success with this avenue are not nearly as infinitesimal as many are making it out to be. I'd give it a 15% chance of working myself.
I'd bet that Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas are all lobbying to take up the case. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to mr_lebowski (Reply #10)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:16 AM
dware (9,685 posts)
12. Respectfully,
I wouldn't even give it that much, more like, IMHO, less than 7%.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to dware (Reply #12)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:23 AM
mr_lebowski (31,930 posts)
15. What I want to know is ... what are we all prepared to do if this fuckery takes place?
That cannot be allowed to stand.
You know that right? |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to mr_lebowski (Reply #15)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:28 AM
dware (9,685 posts)
16. Yes, I do know that.
If that were to happen, the country would cease to exist as we know it, there would be massive civil disobedience, probably CW2, the country would disintegrate, which is exactly why, besides TX. ridiculous lawsuit, the SC will not hear this.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to dware (Reply #16)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:29 AM
obamanut2012 (24,206 posts)
17. All of this, ane every other state would start suing other states for this
All the Blue States would sue Red States, etc. They can't allow this, and deny, say, CA suing TX.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to obamanut2012 (Reply #17)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:32 AM
dware (9,685 posts)
18. Exactly!!!
It would be the clusterfuck of all clusterfucks.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to dware (Reply #16)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:40 AM
mr_lebowski (31,930 posts)
27. Yeah? My feeling is our side wouldn't do shit other than whine to the media ...
and on message boards and twitter and facebook.
I don't believe anyone's prepared to do what would become necessary. First step being ... NOBODY, and I mean NOBODY ... goes to freaking work. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to mr_lebowski (Reply #27)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:42 AM
dware (9,685 posts)
28. I think you badly underestimate what we would do.
But, that's my opinion.
Have a great Friday. ![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to dware (Reply #28)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:45 AM
mr_lebowski (31,930 posts)
29. Well, I promise you whatever it is we're doing ... I WILL BE THERE DOING IT ...
![]() Hopefully, that turns out to be nothing because this BS gets laughed out of court. Which is what I'm best at, really. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to mr_lebowski (Reply #29)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:46 AM
dware (9,685 posts)
32. And I'll be right there with you.
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Original post)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:32 AM
Amishman (5,374 posts)
19. They know that stealing the election from Biden will be domestic violence
On a level not seen in 155 years. They are conservative - not stupid. They also have lifetime appointments and will be inclined to look at the big picture
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Original post)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:35 AM
Codeine (25,586 posts)
21. To you it's a 50/50 shot?
Cite your case law. What are the applicable precedents? Can you provide us with a taste of your background in Constitutional law?
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Codeine (Reply #21)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:37 AM
Proud liberal 80 (4,164 posts)
22. Don't have any of those credentials
Just know that 5 of these justices are political hacks and don’t care about that shit.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Reply #22)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:38 AM
Codeine (25,586 posts)
24. And when it fails utterly?
Will you cease to spread your FUD for a few days at least?
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Codeine (Reply #24)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:39 AM
Proud liberal 80 (4,164 posts)
25. Yes
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Reply #22)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:39 AM
dware (9,685 posts)
26. Where's your proof that they "don't care about that shit"?
Just because Pissollini nominated them doesn't mean that they will vote in his favor.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Original post)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:37 AM
Mike 03 (16,616 posts)
23. Why is it somehow not comforting that a widespread attempt to overturn the
most secure election in history will almost certainly fail? Such a thing should never have happened here in the first place. What have they learned during this process that will make it easier for them to actually succeed next time?
A door that is never opened, opened once, becomes a door that is more frequently used. ![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Mike 03 (Reply #23)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:47 AM
unblock (51,379 posts)
33. exactly. the real concern here is not that it will succeed *this* time.
it's that what little functional democracy we have left is in great jeopardy with so many people in power, in our media, and across the country willing to completely jettison the will of the people.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Original post)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:45 AM
unblock (51,379 posts)
30. the people who understand how coups work (when they work) know that it's not out of the question
it don't think it's close to 50/50, but it's not tiny either.
those who completely dismiss it give too much weight to what the institutions are *supposed* to do, what the law says, what the norms are, etc. those who think a coup has a non-zero change figure that it all depends on just how corrupt the institutions have become, because in the end it all depends on the integrity of the people in the various institutions. if the supreme court decides, hey, we have at least 5-4 to completely ignore all kinds of laws and elections and norms and just hand the presidency to the guy the court majority prefers, then they could do that. personally, i think this is a bridge too far even for the radical right members of the supreme court. had the election been close, or had there been an actual controversy, then sure, they would have stolen it for donnie, just like they stole it for shrub in 2000. but the election wasn't actually close or really in dispute. it's just a propaganda dispute. so i don't think the supreme court would actually overturn this election. too obvious. 2000 was close, they could get away with it. not this time. that said, coups can often look silly and improbable right up until they actually succeed. in the end, we're relying on 5 right-wingers not to agree to be complete schmucks. so i can't say the probability is zero. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Original post)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 11:45 AM
Saboburns (2,807 posts)
31. Like it's 50/50 that I'll make sweet love to Beyonce today.
Either I will.
Or. I won't. Fifty-fifty. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Original post)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 08:20 PM
LanternWaste (37,748 posts)
34. Missed it by that much, eh?
What specifically (and logically valid) lead you to allege it had a 50/50 chance?
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to LanternWaste (Reply #34)
Fri Dec 11, 2020, 08:21 PM
Kingofalldems (37,189 posts)
35. Next: The Electoral College
50-50
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Original post)
Sat Dec 12, 2020, 10:24 AM
Codeine (25,586 posts)
36. Another in a string of Trump failures
and FUD flailings. Can we stop now?
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Original post)
Sat Dec 12, 2020, 10:53 AM
Sam1 (498 posts)
37. For the next four years
all we are going to hear will in the be the Lost Cause, the Bloody Shirt, and the Stab in the Back all rolled in to one. Trump is not going away! And if he does someone else will show up to carry on the good fight!
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Proud liberal 80 (Original post)
Sam1 This message was self-deleted by its author.