AOC nails it

[Dem4Life1102]

Link to tweet

[TexasTowelie]

1. To be fair, the current Texas GOP chair

moved here from Florida.

[ornotna]

2. Apparently

It's not nutty enough for him in Florida.

[Baitball Blogger]

3. LOL!

[Lochloosa]

4. We didnt make him feel welcome.

[uponit7771]

5. Putin is proud

[UCmeNdc]

6. Kick

[bucolic_frolic]

7. Whew! What a relief! When the title said "nails it" I thought it was 95 Theses

Thanks, AOC, for tempering output just a little.

[jaxexpat]

8. Very little is known about Ocasio Cortez-Luther or her 95 theses. Too many words.

[Maeve]

9. No, the Supreme Court said that states determine for themselves if they violated their own laws

And the states being sued repeatedly said they followed their own laws and you, Texas, can take a flying leap!

[randr]

10. BTW Confederacy of Dunces is a great read

[BobsYourUncle]

16. I saw the movie and feel like I've lived through a lot of it.

I should read the book but will not hold my breath. I curse my Catholic 1 through college education for my inability to enjoy reading.

[randr]

19. I did not know it was made into a movie, thanks!

Will definitely put it on my list.

[Joinfortmill]

11. More like a Confederacy of Traitors

[pwb]

12. Trump enabled the High School dropouts to rise

in hate.

[2naSalit]

14. +1

[Captain Stern]

13. republicans were all about state's rights...till they weren't.

They are for state's rights as long as the states are doing what they want.

But, when the states are not doing what they want....then, not so much.

I know the word 'sad' is overused, but in this case it's appropriate.

I've come to the conclusion that many (maybe 'most') republicans are 'for' republicans and against anything that isn't them.....like logic, rationale discourse, the world, identifying problems, solving problems, understanding how shit works, personal responsibility (yup, they even lost that), sacrifice for country, smaller federal government (that's not them any more either),

There actually was a time when Democrats and Republicans would argue over policies.....not facts.

We'd all accept the facts, and understand them, then argue about which course(s) of action should be taken.

Now, we have over a hundred republican representatives that don't even know who won a Presidential election that was held a mere five weeks ago.

[Yeehah]

15. Good description of the republican party

A confederacy of traitorous dunces.

[Quemado]

18. Traitorous grifting (and grifted) dunces

grieving over the loss of a way of life that existed in the 19th century.

[denbot]

17. She is second only to my own Congress critter, Ted Lui.

I hope I see her behind the resolute desk some day.

[NurseJackie]

20. WWND?

[MadLinguist]

21. Ignatius J. Reilly would cuss these fuqquers a blue streak

and quiz their fake asses on what the hell a kraken could possibly be, on his way to farting them out of the place

[stopbush]

22. Why would anyone think that a bunch of states who trash the current Constitution

would refrain from trashing their new Constitution were they to secede and form a new Union? A leopard doesn’t change its spots and there is no honor among thieves. Once a seditious traitor, always a seditious traitor.

[aidbo]

23. You know, plenty of other less controversial Democrats have been..

..calling it a confederacy of dunces for a long time. Don’t know why we should be paying so much attention to one of the most popular and influential congressperson in decades.

Im not saying anything, I’m just saying.

[Autumn]

24. First time I've heard that term. I missed the book but I've ordered it. Who else has called them

confederacy of dunces? Cause they deserve some kudos. I googled and the only one other than AOC that came up was Joe Scarborough and he is NOT a Democrat in any way shape or form.