General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsmalaise
(268,997 posts)RFN!
Hugin
(33,140 posts)At least now there is some understanding of pathogens and vaccines.
BannonsLiver
(16,387 posts)Here is the original, which had nothing to do with the 1918 pandemic.
https://knowledge.e.southern.edu/wwiposters/83/
Hugin
(33,140 posts)Still, true.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)Sometimes Dems are just as gullible as RWers.
uponit7771
(90,336 posts)... seeing 1. we know wearing a mask worked then and we have better masks now and 2. we put a man on the moon before I was born.
Jus ... damn
PatSeg
(47,430 posts)Most people didn't travel very much back then, so it is likely that for many, it didn't spread as far or as quickly as it does today. There would have been areas totally unaffected by the pandemic, because they didn't come in contact with any infected people. Of course, we have the advantage of more sanitary living conditions. Indoor plumbing especially gives us an edge.
sarge43
(28,941 posts)All those military and naval personnel returning from the war zones. They were from North America, all of Europe, Africa, India, Australia, New Zealand. They were packed into trains and troop ships. If even one in a hundred were infected ... we know the result. Worse, in Europe, especially Eastern Europe, the medical support was stretched to the breaking point and beyond. In India and sub Sahara Africa, wasn't much to begin with and broken by the first wave.
It was a plague's dream scenario.
I was going to mention the military leaving middle America and carrying the flu to Europe, but the average American tended to stay pretty close to home much of the time. Today, people get on planes and travel across country or overseas fairly regularly. I was surprised when working on numerous branches of my family tree, that I didn't find one mention of the flu, but most of these people lived on farms or in small towns. For them, the pandemic might have been something they read about in the newspaper.
How different things might have been if the U.S. hadn't sent sick soldiers to Europe, at least in the size and spread of the pandemic.
sarge43
(28,941 posts)a lot of those servicemen came from farms and small towns. Further, once back in the US most of them would have traveled all over returning to their homes.
Your family was fortunate; however, as it is today, people were traumatized. They were reluctant to talk about their experiences. I had to directly ask my mother about hers and she usually had no problem talking about the two clan's shenanigans. This isn't just a one off. Several studies and documentaries mention survivor reluctance, a common symptom of post trauma. Not saying your family was among them, just offering a possibility.
Here is one of the best summation I've run across:https://virus.stanford.edu/uda
US population 1920: 106M and it was about half and half rural v. urban.
niyad
(113,302 posts)gademocrat7
(10,657 posts)Very good advice then and now.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)BannonsLiver
(16,387 posts)Whos is what this poster was actually about, not influenza.
https://knowledge.e.southern.edu/wwiposters/83/
safeinOhio
(32,676 posts)the neighbor tossing food over the fence. His mother had the Spanish Flu.
Then, almost 30 years later he was one the military that got an experimental vaccine for the Yellow Fever. It was a faulty vaccine that he contracted Hep A from it.
My Grandmother went on to live into her 90s and so did Dad.
sarge43
(28,941 posts)She told me about watching coffins being dropped off at neighbors' homes. Three of her school friends died.
With one exception, her family all came down with the flu - grandfather, father, aunt, brother, sister and herself. Her grandmother was a RN, didn't succumb and somehow kept them all alive. She said the hospitals weren't an option, all filled up.
safeinOhio
(32,676 posts)See lots of young people that died in 1918 and 1919.
Ligyron
(7,632 posts)More infant and childhood death, of course and the weaker, for the most part, just didnt live long enough to even reproduce, most people waiting for marriage to have kids.
Fast forward to huge medical advances and multiple pregnancies before the age of 16.
frogmarch
(12,153 posts)in 1918. He was 12.
Thanks for posting this!