General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAre we done bedwetting???
Have we realized why President Obama was really, really smart, when faced with Mitt's debate strategy?
How when faced with the lies and deceit:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251120949
How when faced with deliberate provocation:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021464287
How when faced with with Robme Wanting a Platform for Zingers/47% apology:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021475018
President Obama did his best not to engage a bully? He didn't explain, defend, or otherwise let this asshole deliver his zingers, his apology, his schtick. He acted like a President.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1469106
Because he knew this was coming:
Upcoming Jobs Numbers:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021475945
Are we done bedwetting???? Because if Big Bird can get it together:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021475202
So can we all. It's a long five weeks. Gird your loins. Find out how you can help get the vote out on Election Day, and then do it.
Yes, We Can. And We Will. Again.
gkhouston
(21,642 posts)series, where people on the bridge would collectively lurch left and lurch right during red alerts.
As long as Romney's wearing the red shirt at the end of the day, it's all good.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)tired of the bullshit.
Change the sheets and remember we have 5 weeks ahead.
randome
(34,845 posts)Set phasers to 'Romney'!
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Raster
(20,999 posts)AGENT MIKE: Just asking a question and making an observation. We are in no way suggesting or threatening harm to Mr. Robme. We're not like that other batshit-crazy political site.
gkhouston
(21,642 posts)Yes, that usually means death-by-alien, but I'd be good with became-infatuated-with-best-friend-of-the-alien-girl-of-the-week-and-jumped-ship.
Raster
(20,999 posts)Godless in Seattle
(120 posts)"
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)porphyrian
(18,530 posts)MineralMan
(148,155 posts)DU like a fart in church. Good news, not so much. We're a site full of news watchers and followers, so daily stuff gets a lot of attention. We also listen to pundits a lot, so whatever they say gets lots of attention. Sometimes, DU looks like a panic attack when there's news that we don't like.
Then, the next day, it all settles down and waits for the next silent fart. We begin again at that point.
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(121,862 posts)It's like, OMG, who farted?! We're all gonna die!
When that sort of political indigestion and flatulence occurs I tend to drift away from DU for a bit until the fart dissipates rather than stick around, just inhaling the vapors and complaining. The purely anthropological and sociological aspects of internet-based mass hysteria are interesting, up to a point, and also pretty predictable.
So I guess DU has now had its necessary dose of Beano and we can breathe again for awhile.
CTyankee
(65,441 posts)I am pissed off for the rest of the day!
Don't get me wrong. I'd be unhappy without my DU. I just think that liberals tend to be Chronically Morally Outraged...
MineralMan
(148,155 posts)I'm not sure why so many are so pessimistic, but there it is.
CTyankee
(65,441 posts)It's a good thing in one sense and it's a bad thing in another...
MineralMan
(148,155 posts)I'm an idealist, but always recognize that ideals are rarely realized. We get shadows on the back of the cave, but the ideal can't be seen clearly.
Then there are idealists who can't be satisfied by anything less than the perfected ideal. They are doomed to disappointment, since each has a different ideal in mind.
For me, ideals are targets, and targets only. We keep aiming for them, but we have inaccurate tools that miss most of the time. All we can do is keep trying.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... making personal insults about our fellow party members for expressing their valid concerns?
I fucking doubt it.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)Response to 99Forever (Reply #6)
AnotherMcIntosh This message was self-deleted by its author.
Glitterati
(3,182 posts)What better why to split up the party?
It's the ground game on DU - beat up on your fellow DEMs while doing NOTHING to get your candidates elected.
If you're living on DU, you ain't out there getting the job done.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)it would be rather interesting.
I'll be watching the Biden/Ryan debate with my fellow Obama campaign workers. And on election day, I'll be a legal observer, again, for my President.
You?
Glitterati
(3,182 posts)Keeping their power on, encouraging them to get their home out of foreclosure and explaining why Obama is a far better choice than Romney.
I don't think I can handle any more than 7 at a time.
As for the Biden debate, I don't think I'm watching anymore debates. While I expect Joe to wipe the floor with Ryan, I just can't take the demoralizing if it doesn't happen.
on edit:
But, the truth is, shitting all over your compatriots like this isn't helping.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)it might be more rewarding!
Glitterati
(3,182 posts)there isn't one. My county votes 90% republican (if you can believe the voting machines) and we don't even HAVE a DEM party here.
randome
(34,845 posts)But you're right, it's time to stop crying and march on!
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)was thought out before hand. The non-Angry Black Man is an automatic.
But I think the disengagement was a reaction to Romney's Gish Gallop routine.
randome
(34,845 posts)Not convinced that everything else was part of some hidden strategy, though. But, hell, if it was me on stage there, I don't know if I'd have done better, either!
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)I think responding to the Gish Gallop routine was on the fly.
I do think the President was prepared to debate. He was not prepared to debate THAT.
If I could fault the President, it would be that he expected that Romney would have the integrity to show up and debate the positions he's held for the past 18 months. He underestimated just how much of a piece of shit Romney really is.
speedoo
(11,229 posts)I agree and that was the only error. For the hand-wringers, that error was unforgivable, but it turns out that Obama's decision, apparantly on the fly, to limit his response, was right because we are now seeing a ton of "Romney lies" reaction.
So, bottom line, Obama did pretty well given what he was confronted with. The hand-wringers, as usual, were wrong.
OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)he dutifully went over to Fox and had them ask about what he would have said.
AND he said he would have said he was wrong. lol! I've seen less flipping at Cirque Dy Soleil.
(((("Psssst - hey rich guys - the moochers are tryna take your stash!" )))
"Ohhhhh, hey there li'l 47%ers - I was just bullllllllllshittin'...y'all cool...."
((((Pssst, hey rich guys - no they aren't..." )))
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Well played Obama!
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)me through the restless night and morning after the debate!
jsmirman
(4,507 posts)as are voiunteers.
The Obama campaign has admitted their candidate's ineffectiveness, because the most effective follow up to the debate is, "yeah, our man really should have done better, considering what a serial prevaricator he was facing and the fact that his opponent contradicted himself nearly every time he opened his mouth."
That establishes credibility by being willing to acknowledge the reality of Obama's weirdly flaccid performance, hammers the reality that Romney is a liar, establishes the lack of credibility of any of Romney's "positions," and sets us up to move on.
Pleased with the debate? Very much no. I don't care what the incumbent scorecard has been in past debates. In that debate the opportunities cried out to be seized and so many of us would have been ready with withering, above-board counterattacks.
But it's OVER. Yes, I'm fully ready to move on. The goals are still the goals. The president has gotten the picture from people he has to listen to - big donors who told him his performance was shit. So now we all move on. Nothing wrong with doing so by acknowledging reality.
But yes, it's time for all of us to fight that lying sack of shit that is Romney harder than ever.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)you though-- a new meme.....
Romney had such disrespect for the President and the Presidency that he refused to debate in good faith. He refused to show respect for us, the American people.
That same 47 percent he is apologizing to??? He didn't respect us enough to give us a real debate on issues.
jsmirman
(4,507 posts)With clear as day proof that the man stands for nothing, why should anyone believe his plans extend any further than tax cuts for the rich and murdering regulation and Big Bird?
Everyone knows he has no respect for anyone. I'd go more with the image of a sneering plutocrat who plays pretend on the topic of taxes and jobs, all the while continuing to promote tax cuts for the rich on his site, not paying taxes on his own, and reaping the benefits of tax breaks for outsourcing American jobs.
His money is offshore and so are the American jobs he sent packing.
MineralMan
(148,155 posts)up in Madison yesterday to cheer the President. Everyone is pissed at Obama, for sure.
jsmirman
(4,507 posts)MineralMan
(148,155 posts)This morning, there is different news. Tomorrow, there will be more different news. The debate isn't the only news.
Personally, I thought the President did just fine in backing off and letting Willard rant on.
nxylas
(6,440 posts)Pick yourself up, dust yourself off and start all over again. The "11-dimensional chess" bullshit, pretending that the President's poor performance was part of some fiendish plan, probably does more harm than good, as it just makes us look like sore losers. Whatever happened to taking defeat on the chin, like an adult?
jsmirman
(4,507 posts)I'm fairly well to the left, and I tend to tune out people of my own persuasion when they're clearly talking bullshit, lol.
Most people watching the debate are not as sophisticated as the DU crowd. They may not be familiar with the issue details so they may have believed the numbers thrown out by Romney -- after all, he is running for the highest office in the land and they are giving him the benefit of the doubt.
The first debate is critical, and Pres. Obama, a smart thoughtful man, could have handled it better. But he didn't fail, and generally gave a good impression depite Romney's distracting performance.
But as you wisely point out, it's over and we have to move on. I'm sure the president now knows what he's dealing with, and will be able to handle Romney more effectively for the next two debates.
jsmirman
(4,507 posts)and what happened in the past is that Mitt lied his rear end off and temporarily got away with it.
Okay.
Plenty to work with from there. Doesn't change the past, but we can change the future.
LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)Romney caught him off guard. Still, I believe Obama's instinct to play defense was the right one. We have had smatterings of discussions here about gender perception. What I saw was Obama checking his temper in the face of provocation. A couple of times he breathed deep and gathered himself, but he did not explode in anger. He looked tired and care worn and that reminded me that he has other things on his mind beyond landing a zinger or two for political theater. Mitt's lies pissed me off, and I was terribly annoyed when they said, "We mostly agree." My blood pressure sky rocketed every time. Still and all, the words that some DUers would put in Obama's mouth don't strike me well when I imagine President Obama speaking them. Perhaps they would have been momentarily gratifying, but ultimately not as effective as the message discipline that Obama exercised.
Do I think it was planned? Beyond the resolve not to pound the 47% angle, no, I don't. As I said, I think Obama acted from instinct. Watching the drama play out over the ensuing hours helps me to trust his instincts.
Blue Idaho
(5,500 posts)Can we get back to re-electing a Democratic President now?
Sugarcoated
(8,120 posts)Good one
KharmaTrain
(31,706 posts)...we now how job numbers to play with and surely some other poll or document dump will come our way later today or over the weekend.
It's the sturn and drang that makes DU the fun place it is...especially during election time.
obamanut2012
(27,961 posts)On Intrade!
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)obamanut2012
(27,961 posts)Social Media is a real force in news and politics now, and twitter is all a... err.... flutter with Big Bird hash tags and parody accounts. Things like this help keep Romney's snarkiness and meanness alive and relevant. Anyone over a certain age watched "Sesame Street," or had kids that did/do.
MineralMan
(148,155 posts)And so it goes. Next week the debate will be forgotten and something else will take its place.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)MineralMan
(148,155 posts)Save steps.
Really, though, the VP debate is likely to be full of fire and brimstone, and should be entertaining. Completely irrelevant to the outcome of the election, but entertaining.
Loose the Biden of war on the Ryan of defeat!
You know where I'll be during the debate.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)When my husband designed his man-cave it did not escape my notice that he positioned the TV in a manner that allowed a viewer to watch unobstructed from the adjoining bathroom when the door was open.
So I had a lock put on the man-cave door. And he thanked me for my foresight.
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)Because if there were two more different personalities then Ryan and Biden I couldn't find them.
obamanut2012
(27,961 posts)Biden is also exciting to watch -- you never know what he will say. He is, however, a smart guy.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)obamanut2012
(27,961 posts)I also think he's a really nice guy, and a smart one.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)obamanut2012
(27,961 posts)porphyrian
(18,530 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)porphyrian
(18,530 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)porphyrian
(18,530 posts)Response to porphyrian (Reply #23)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
porphyrian
(18,530 posts)Kennah
(14,465 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Kennah
(14,465 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts). I think the President and his people could have made somewhat better choices about how to deal with an unrelenting liar telling unrelenting lies, but I also don't think it matters in the long run. Mitt lost the night. Also, Obama did not win the night. But Mitt lost. No doubt about it. And that's what matters.
And what's that lyric from Dreamgirls? 'A second rate diva who can't sustain'. That's what's next. Mitt blew out his range the first night. Also, I think of that Bugs and Daffy cartoon where they are topping each other in a Vaudeville show down, the acts get crazier and crazier until Daffy sets himself on fire and his soul leaves his body saying 'it's a great act, but you can only do it once'.
obamanut2012
(27,961 posts)That, in and of itself, is also something to remember. No ammo for the GOP. They have nothing, as their 2007 Rev. Wright video shows.
H2O Man
(75,925 posts)Fight the "Good Fight."
gateley
(62,683 posts)down and feel confident again. So no more bed wedding for me!
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Response to msanthrope (Original post)
Post removed
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)I'm gonna go eat some pizza and laugh over your unintended funny!!!!
H2O Man
(75,925 posts)Likely a Good Thing.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)after reading the courage and REASON shown here against a lying, cheating sociopath, I got my second wind. thanks.
Response to msanthrope (Original post)
Post removed
polichick
(37,626 posts)donheld
(21,319 posts)Too many, if there is something posted they don't like It suddenly becomes rude, insensitive...
Response to donheld (Reply #121)
polichick This message was self-deleted by its author.
polichick
(37,626 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Response to randome (Reply #56)
AnotherMcIntosh This message was self-deleted by its author.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)... snarky nitpicking. That'll win friends and influence people.
I also note you didn't respond to the question I posed to you upthread.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)voting behavior, or the voting behavior of any potential Obama voter????
Please.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)... continually insist that ANY criticism or questioning of the current administration
or pointing out the rightward direction of the Democratic Party will "suppress voter turnout."
I'm glad we agree that that persistent claim is completely BOGUS.
[font color=firebrick size=3][center]"If we don't fight hard enough for the things we stand for,
at some point we have to recognize that we don't really stand for them."
--- Paul Wellstone[/font][/center]
[center][/font]
[font size=1]photo by bvar22
Shortly before Sen Wellstone was killed[/center][/font]
[font size=5 color=firebrick]Solidarity![/font]
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Personally, I could have given a rat's ass about the fevered rantings of BBI---it was giving a platform to sources that were right-wing and Libertarian, as an appeal to authority, that was bogus.
Critique the President all you want bvar. I doubt you will change a single vote.
But use DU as a platform for other agendas??? That's a paddlin'
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Consistency is the hallmark of an honest broker.
Your dots don't connect.
[font color=firebrick size=3][center]"If we don't fight hard enough for the things we stand for,
at some point we have to recognize that we don't really stand for them."
--- Paul Wellstone[/font][/center]
[center][/font]
[font size=1]photo by bvar22
Shortly before Sen Wellstone was killed[/center][/font]
[font size=5 color=firebrick]Solidarity![/font]
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... for someone else. Address the issue of you insulting other members of the Democratic Party for expressing their VALID concerns or don't. That's the ONLY thing I care to discuss with you.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)... yet you have yet to respond to them.
Next excuse?
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)describe DUers who aren't defending a fugitive rapist.
I think your comportment on various Assange threads speaks for itself.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)That says all that's necessary.
Have a nice day.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)... question.
I see you need to have virtually everything explained in detail so you can understand it. Why am I not surprised?
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)It's all you've got.
Response to msanthrope (Original post)
Post removed
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)madrchsod
(58,162 posts)mittens lost and obama won.
great white snark
(2,646 posts)OUTSTANDING post msanthrope. So outstanding you brought out some Obama hating heavy hitters.
yellowcanine
(36,353 posts)Bedwetting is not a conscious choice or a character trait any more than stuttering is.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)But, I think this is a topic worth Meta--go post there about how 'bedwetting' should be on the list of no-nos.
I'll pop the corn.
yellowcanine
(36,353 posts)I have no desire to try to get it put on any kind of list. What others think is on or off the "list of no-nos" is not my standard for deciding whether something is morally right. I am speaking as a person who had this as a problem when I was young and it is not funny to me. I also have an elderly father in law who has problems with this because of the blood thinning medications he takes. You can do with that what you want. But I noticed you did not answer my question of whether stuttering is something you would joke about. If you say no I honestly don't see how this is different.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)I'm looking forward to round two.
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)And Obama would not let him. It is still unresolved for Mittens and then he started the apology tour about it.
Ratty
(2,100 posts)He tried to bring a bit of civility and intelligence back to presidential debates, turning away from the freakshow sound-bite obsessed circus the republicans have turned it into. Of course the media is in a tizzy. "Where's my sound bite? Where's something catty I can report on to spice up the story?? Waaah!"
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)porphyrian
(18,530 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)porphyrian
(18,530 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)I don't play poker.
porphyrian
(18,530 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)porphyrian
(18,530 posts)Response to msanthrope (Original post)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)And you better believe I am PASSING IT ON.
K&R!
porphyrian
(18,530 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Well done.
porphyrian
(18,530 posts)Dash87
(3,220 posts)The rebound that never was? Greg Gutfield, Hannity, and Bill Kristol sure know how to call it.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)the man who was weak, timid, and unprepared Wednesday night cannot possibly hold his own against hostile congress. His performance was a disaster, regardless of how much people hate Rmoney. ANyone who believes we saw "9-D chess" or some masterstroke is, frankly, nearly as delusional as the Birthers. I now know why, even with heavy majorities in Congress in 2009-2010, minimal progress was made. The ONLY reason to go to the polls now is to keep Rmoney out of office. Anyone hoping for real Democratic leadership is quite obviously going to have to wait for 2016.
Yeesh. I wish we could still unrec these nutty vanity posts.
Lone_Star_Dem
(28,158 posts)Not really. I just figured you should get at lead one insane reply.
I was a champion (state) debater in HS. Granted that was more than two decades ago now, but still. That was the worst moderation I've ever seen. Even on a HS level. Debates have rules, and Romney walked all over them, spewing a stream of lies as he went. I get that people were angry he got away with that. Still, this isn't HS, and there's a lot more at stake than a medal and a trophy. Obama was in a situation where he was damned if he did, and damned if he didn't.
It was unpleasant to witness, to say the least. So, I get how some people reacted who are honest Obama supporters. Then there's those here who were salivating over the debate to feed their unrest. Trying to make it into something it wasn't.
In the end, I don't see it as having any lasting damage to the elections outcome unless it's repeated. Which I find highly unlikely. So, let the haters froth. They live for it, it's all they have to bring them joy in the world. Sad as that is.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Obama has and will go down in history as having been beaten or dominated in the debate.
He came off as weak and not passionate. He nodded too much when he was lectured and he failed to make any strong points.
BUT...as Rachel Maddow has pointed out, it has very little impact on the ultimate results of the election. So don't worry too much about it.
But seriously, the only bedwetting was done by people like you who cannot even stand to hear what people almost unanimously agreed with as Obama's loss in the debates. You sound like children who are angry that they can't watch TV after 10 o'clock. They attack those who gave their honest opinions and stamp their feet like petulant children. They are doing the bedwetting because they are the ones that think it is a big deal.
So... you need to clean your own sheets, wipe the tears off your face and pull it together. It's not the end of the world. But he did perform poorly.
polichick
(37,626 posts)Iggy
(1,418 posts)when you can pull 60 MIL people away from the football game, you have to take advantage.
regarding Willard's "You spent $90 BIL in one year on incentives for green industries". Rmoney stated
this what? Three times?
Obama's response: crickets....
I get the political expediency behind this (avoiding Solyndra fiasco) but unfortunately Obama totally
blew it on this-- the American people have to understand and commit to the new clean energy
paradigm. Obama needs to explain just why incentives are needed to get the green energy industry
up and running long term.
Obama has to state that studies show the transition to clean energy will in fact create 1,000's of
new jobs and keep our nation on track to deal with, hellooooooo? Climate change.
He didn't do any of this-- just to avoid talking about one mistake.
weak.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)President's base. You think anyone voting for Obama is upset or disappointed by that expenditure? You think he lost independents? Nope--and within 24 hours, Romney was apologizing for overstating the rate of failure---the President got great coverage on the networks about 94% of the companies invested in succeeding.
Heck--I had progressives tell me that they didn't know the President had spent that much and they were happy about it.
That was a Romney MISTAKE--just as stupid as suggesting that cutting the military (after two wars) was a bad thing.
Teachable moment??? I hope Romney does not learn from that mistake.
Iggy
(1,418 posts)I want the American people (many not all that bright to begin with) to understand why we need to
spend money to incentivise green industries... that's the teachable moment I am referring to that
was missed by Obama. he blew it
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Iggy
(1,418 posts)thus what IS the purpose of these so called "debates" then?
A sort of sophomoric popularity contest like the shmucks who run for class president in High School?
Gimme a break. there are dozens of writers/pundits out there making the same point I am.
thanks for the weak spin attempt
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,344 posts)for some it seems to be a chronic condition.
gulliver
(13,333 posts)I hope they get the message. If they hadn't started squalling after the debate, it would have been a split decision. Our pundits gave the media permission to come down hard on Obama. They really blew it, and I hope they know it.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)bluestate10
(10,942 posts)And the President did a poor job during the debate. One issue that turned my stomach was Romney claiming that he worked with the democratic legislature in Massachusetts to get RomneyCare. The fact is that Romney agreed to the health care plan only after it was clear that the legislature was going to approve and implement it's own plan over a Romney veto. Even after agreeing to a plan, Romney tried to gut three key provisions and was over-ridden by the legislature. Even after the legislature forced the law down Romney's throat, Romney dragged his feet implementing the law. Romney set up insurance industry lackeys to set up the critical exchange, making a fucking mess joke of the exchange. The Massachusetts health care law didn't truly get implemented until after Deval Patrick won election in 2006 and came in with the intention of fixing the plan and getting the exchange working. Patrick and the legislature worked hand in hand, Patrick replaced the Romney appointees with consumer oriented health plan administrators, the plan took off establishing more plan choices, getting more companies to make plan offerings and enrolling more children and adults of every background. In essence, RomneyCare should be called PatrickMassachusettsLegislatureCare. I am fucking enraged that Obama's research team didn't fucking investigate Romney's only claim to fame and provided the President with ammo to walk on stage with. The miss can't fucking happen again because we will have an election that is closer than it should be.