General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCOVID-19 could complicate Pelosi's path to Speaker next year
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/530945-covid-19-could-complicate-pelosis-path-to-speaker-next-yearAs Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) seeks the support to keep the gavel for another term, her allies are keeping close watch on a potential wild card that could complicate her path next month: COVID-19.
Pelosi is already facing a much slimmer majority in the next Congress, after Democrats were clobbered at the polls in November, meaning she can afford far fewer Democratic defections than the 15 who opposed her two years ago. And lawmakers must be present on the House floor to cast their vote for Speaker, precluding the option for members to vote remotely, as many have done throughout the pandemic.
The combination of factors creates the chance that Democrats could face a dilemma on Jan. 3 in which Pelosi locks up the Democratic support to remain Speaker, but coronavirus concerns illnesses, quarantines or otherwise prevent a sufficient number of them from being in the Capitol to log their votes.
More at link
Response to Laura PourMeADrink (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
llashram
(6,265 posts)my thoughts exactly. We must not let volume and minor factions keep us from the throats of the reptilians, metaphorically speaking of course. We, during these next 2-4 years, must diminish their perceived power WITH THE TRUTH. This truth hammered daily into the coffins of lies that give the Repthuglican their power over 70million plus jackasses who can't or won't see the truth standing in front of them. That truth being President-elect Joe Biden and his second vice-President elect Kamala Harris.
Response to llashram (Reply #4)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Response to Laura PourMeADrink (Reply #7)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Just looked, and from Roll Call also:
https://www.rollcall.com/2020/11/23/opening-of-117th-congress-will-be-different-due-to-pandemic/
Steny Hoyer says those unable to be present can vote for the speaker by proxy, no prob, but no one can know that all will be well enough to do that much. Also, they don't have a legal procedure yet for being sworn in if not physically present. Can a member vote for speaker without being sworn in?
The issue was raised before, and the parliamentarian ruled you had to be there. He ruled essentially you couldnt be sworn through television, Hoyer said. So I dont know exactly how were going to do it for people who are unable to come.
While that hasnt been resolved, Hoyer said he personally doesnt see why swearing in couldnt be conducted virtually if we can vote virtually and make big decisions virtually.
Under the Constitution, opening day of each Congress is supposed to be Jan. 3. In 2021 that falls on a Sunday, so leaders are likely to move the date to Jan. 4 or Jan. 5, which requires both chambers passing a resolution agreeing to the date change.
Isn't there a quote somewhere about fates of nations hanging on the availability of a safety pin?
No one complain about our representatives getting vaccinated. Plus, they're not the ones who told America Covid was a Democratic lie and blocked all action to contain it.
Response to Hortensis (Reply #2)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)assumes they will change (continue proxy voting).
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)that has not been allowed in the past but will need to be for those who can't attend physically. What Hoyer did not address is that (I'm assuming!) they have to be sworn in to vote.
Seems like this could bite both parties.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)is a no. So people will have to be in DC to be sworn in. Let's just assume they physically go. If all our Dems go then no problem. They can vote for a leader as they normally would. Some against Pelosi, most for her.
This actually is a puzzle.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)sworn in distantly is still to be settled. That as far as our leaders are concerned, it needs to be revisited and a ruling made to allow it.
That said, I've read more than once that congressional rules and procedures in general are so byzantine (deliberately) that most members have no idea how to really use them and frequently get sucker punched by those who do. So I'd never assume anything I read gave any real understanding. There's always more.
The parliamentarian is required to be impartial and consistent in principle, but it's fortunate the current one was appointed by the current speaker (I just looked), so that's Pelosi, not Dirty McCarthy.
Fullduplexxx
(7,863 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Demsrule86
(68,565 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)MineralMan
(146,307 posts)If there's something The Hill can stir up, it will be stirred up.
edhopper
(33,579 posts)in disarray again?
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)tritsofme
(17,377 posts)brought about by a global pandemic and complicated by our razor thin majority? Its just the reality we are dealing with, and the contingencies that leaders must plan for.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Response to tritsofme (Reply #20)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
tritsofme
(17,377 posts)Response to tritsofme (Reply #23)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.