General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy can't anyone spell 'martial law' correctly?
Gen. George Marshall has nothing to do with it.
tanyev
(49,297 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)walkingman
(10,865 posts)Mariana
(15,626 posts)Many of the people who misspell it went to school a long, long time ago.
shelshaw
(698 posts)MineralMan
(151,269 posts)I can spell martial law correctly. So can most people. Only a tiny minority of people can't spell it correctly.
I once saw it written "Marital Law," so there is that, too.
That's not a real issue.
hlthe2b
(113,973 posts)Blues Heron
(8,838 posts)hlthe2b
(113,973 posts)(I never learned to spell phonetically, but rather am usually very accurate from visual memory of how a correctly spelled word "looks" )
So, it really does bother me, though I don't usually point them out.
Hugin
(37,848 posts)Philanders, as they are?
I dunno.
North Shore Chicago
(4,243 posts)Martia! Martia! Martia!
I honestly don't have the foggiest.
panader0
(25,816 posts)PJMcK
(25,048 posts)Those who misspell "martial" can't marshal the resources to spell it correctly.
Siwsan
(27,834 posts)MissB
(16,344 posts)marmar
(79,741 posts)Silent3
(15,909 posts)...the spelling "Marshall law" is deemed correct.
At gunpoint.

by the reigning magistrate
mtnsnake
(22,236 posts)https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/laying-down-the-law-on-martial-and-marshal-and-marshall
niyad
(132,446 posts)I have seen spell check do some very weird things.
Arthur_Frain
(2,358 posts)These days, the mean is a cool room temperature, kiddo.
The lack of education of the American people (even on this site) is simply astounding.
Turin_C3PO
(16,385 posts)the young people in our society are the ones who support Trump the least. So I doubt it's any new development in our education system.
cojoel
(1,027 posts)that started in 1987. I have never seen it, but it came up one time when I did a google search.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshal_Law_%28comics%29
PCIntern
(28,369 posts)safeinOhio
(37,651 posts)If the reader understands what you wrote, it is correct.
Chipper Chat
(10,870 posts)".then it is NOT illegal. "
HAB911
(10,440 posts)Marital Aids?
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Towlie
(5,577 posts)
←
Bucky
(55,334 posts)
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)frogmarch
(12,251 posts)I found the name of the Mann Act of 1910 confusing. Named after Congressman James Mann of Illinois, (wiki) ...it made it a felony to engage in interstate or foreign commerce transport of "any woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose." It was also called the White Slave Traffic Act. Of course it was.
For years I didn't know it was the name of a federal law. I thought it was "the man act," and that it meant rape. I think my mom did too, because I'd heard about it from her as she warned my sister and me about certain kinds of men who might want to perform the man act on us.
By the way, it was a DUer who informed me about the actual Mann Act.
Totally Tunsie
(11,854 posts)there are multitudes who can't get "there", "their", and "they're" correct. Talk about needing some correction...!