General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm wondering something about Cabinet resignations and the 25th Amendment
This is just me pondering, not assuming, but ...
The spate of cabinet resignations is interesting and is leading some to speculate that the rats are deserting the sinking ship to avoid having to invoke the 25th Amendment. BUT
Resigning is not the only way to avoid invoking the Amendment. They could just not agree to it. It's not like they take a vote. There just needs to be a majority willing to sign the declaration. But if they stay, maybe signing it puts them in a difficult situation.
BUT, leaving may actually make it more likely the 25th can be invoked without putting these secretaries on the spot.
The 25th Amendment requires a majority, not of Cabinet secretaries, but of "principal Officers" of the departments. This language is interesting and important. The "principal Officer" is the secretary, if there is one. But if the secretary's office is vacant, someone else serves as the principal Officer of the agency.
That means that if, for example, Elaine Chao resigns, the acting Secretary - probably the current Deputy Secretary - will be DOT's principal officer and THEY would have the authority to sign the declaration
I think that it's probably easier for the lower level department officials to sign off on the invocation of the 25th Amendment than for the higher profile Secretaries like DeVos and Chao.
Could it be that they are resigning to make it more likely that a majority of department heads will step up and remove Trump?
Hmmm.
hurple
(1,306 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)He's discussed it with you?
herding cats
(19,568 posts)I missed it somehow.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Earlier today to discuss, then he refused to take call.
Has not called back, per Nancy's fairly recent tweet.
Impeachment, via rast-track, appears to be in motion.
I believe Dems are meeting tomorriw to discuss. 2-day process.
herding cats
(19,568 posts)Having gotten nothing done yesterday I've been extra busy today and have missed some.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Glad you are getting stuff done!
I've been seething, while reading DU & news.
Nadler approved fast track.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Yes, it's Palmer Report, but concise.
https://www.palmerreport.com/analysis/house-judiciary-committee-chair-jerry-nadler-unveils-plan-to-fast-track-donald-trumps-impeachment/35331/
herding cats
(19,568 posts)I greatly appreciate it!
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Bill Palmer is a decent person. Hates dump.
RockRaven
(15,003 posts)person into the vacated position. IF -- and I don't know the answer -- the "acting secretary of X" counts as the principle officer even when there is a nonacting, properly confirmed deputy.
What does the resigning person get out of this? Absolving themselves of blame when he is not removed and yet still does more crazy shit.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)He can't just put whomever he wants into an acting position. There are legal restrictions to who can fill those posts.
And if the secretaries are actually using this strategy, they would certainly first make sure the person who would fill the acting role isn't owned by Trump and would sign the declaration.
To answer your question, whomever steps in as acting secretary would be the principal official, regardless the position they previously held.
Stallion
(6,476 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)There is no question that an acting secretary is the principal officer of the department. That's the point of designating an acting secretary.
And even if he tried, this is not a matter Trump would be able to get resolved in court. There's not enough time.
Renew Deal
(81,873 posts)They would have stayed if he was.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Sparkly
(24,149 posts)As a cop-out, basically.
I know what Pence said, but Trump threw him under the bus. He could still survive. I think he'd be in a worse situation if he stands by Trump, and there's another disaster in the next two weeks.
Feeling lucky, Mike?
Mr.Bill
(24,330 posts)25th amendment happens or plays out, in the future they can always say they would have signed it or not signed it.