New York Times Website!

5 replies, 2217 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

5 replies	Author	Time	Post
New York Times Website! (Original post)	George II	Wednesday	OP
Woo-Hoo !!!!	Talitha	Wednesday	#1
K&R	smirkymonkey	Wednesday	#2
232 votes to impeach?	Aussie105	Wednesday	#3
Oh yeah!	mcar	Wednesday	#4
Don't get me wrong. I am all about the impeachment, and happy that it's moved as quickly as it has.	BobTheSubgenius	Wednesday	#5

Response to George II (Original post)

Wed Jan 13, 2021, 05:18 PM

Talitha (3,988 posts)

1. Woo-Hoo !!!!

Reply to this post

Response to George II (Original post)

Wed Jan 13, 2021, 05:20 PM

smirkymonkey (57,963 posts)

2. K&R

Reply to this post

Response to George II (Original post)

Wed Jan 13, 2021, 08:12 PM

Aussie105 (2,262 posts)

3. 232 votes to impeach?

Votes that say Trump is useless? Great!

197 votes that say Trump is a good boy?

Take those 197 names please, and set up some Chinese style re-education camps, please!

Reply to this post

Response to George II (Original post)

Wed Jan 13, 2021, 08:13 PM

mcar (35,338 posts)

4. Oh yeah!

Reply to this post

Response to George II (Original post)

Wed Jan 13, 2021, 08:46 PM

BobTheSubgenius (5,926 posts)

5. Don't get me wrong. I am all about the impeachment, and happy that it's moved as quickly as it has.

But that 197. Whoo boy. Almost 200 legislators think this was acceptable behaviour? Seriously? I can see 200 not wanting to go along with "Shoot On Sight," but this...there is something seriously wrong with the process.

Reply to this post

General Discussion (Forum)