Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New York Times Website! (Original Post)
George II
Jan 2021
OP
Don't get me wrong. I am all about the impeachment, and happy that it's moved as quickly as it has.
BobTheSubgenius
Jan 2021
#5
Talitha
(7,777 posts)1. Woo-Hoo !!!!
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)2. K&R
Aussie105
(7,720 posts)3. 232 votes to impeach?
Votes that say Trump is useless? Great!
197 votes that say Trump is a good boy?
Take those 197 names please, and set up some Chinese style re-education camps, please!
mcar
(45,813 posts)4. Oh yeah!
BobTheSubgenius
(12,182 posts)5. Don't get me wrong. I am all about the impeachment, and happy that it's moved as quickly as it has.
But that 197. Whoo boy. Almost 200 legislators think this was acceptable behaviour? Seriously? I can see 200 not wanting to go along with "Shoot On Sight," but this...there is something seriously wrong with the process.

